i
When a smaller Roman numeral appears before a larger one, it means that the smaller value is subtracted from the larger one. For example, IV represents 4, where I (1) is subtracted from V (5). This rule is applied to maintain the proper order and value in the Roman numeral system.
right
I am not sure that I understand your question. Do you mean which of the two numerals V or D should not be repeated in a numeral? If that is you question then the answer is that neither of them should be repeated. V = 5, so VV would in theory = 10 but there is already a Roman numeral for 10, which is X. D = 500 and in theory DD would = 1000 but again there is an existing Roman numeral for 1000, which is M.
Yes, the M can be repeated up to 3 times side by side before a numeral would be considered invalid. MMM = 3000 MMMM = Invalid roman numeral. MMMCM = 3900 and is valid.
The Roman numeral for 228 is CCXXVIII. It is represented by the combining of the symbols for 100 (C) and 10 (X), repeated twice, followed by the symbol for 5 (V) and 1 (I), repeated three times.
When a smaller Roman numeral appears before a larger one, it means that the smaller value is subtracted from the larger one. For example, IV represents 4, where I (1) is subtracted from V (5). This rule is applied to maintain the proper order and value in the Roman numeral system.
right
I am not sure that I understand your question. Do you mean which of the two numerals V or D should not be repeated in a numeral? If that is you question then the answer is that neither of them should be repeated. V = 5, so VV would in theory = 10 but there is already a Roman numeral for 10, which is X. D = 500 and in theory DD would = 1000 but again there is an existing Roman numeral for 1000, which is M.
Yes, the M can be repeated up to 3 times side by side before a numeral would be considered invalid. MMM = 3000 MMMM = Invalid roman numeral. MMMCM = 3900 and is valid.
The Roman numeral for 228 is CCXXVIII. It is represented by the combining of the symbols for 100 (C) and 10 (X), repeated twice, followed by the symbol for 5 (V) and 1 (I), repeated three times.
919 can't be written as CIC because of the following rule: The letter I cannot be subtracted to a letter that is more than 10 times greater. Example: [IX] 1 can be subtracted from 10 but 1 cannot be subtracted from 20 as in [IXX]. [IC] is not right because 1 cannot be subtracted from 100 because 100 is more than 10 times greater than 1. Therefore, 199 is written as CXCIX in Roman Numeral.
The Roman numeral CDXC represents the number 490. C (100) is subtracted from D (500) to give 400, and XC (90) is added to 400 to get 490.
The Roman numeral XXXIX represents the number 39. X (10) is subtracted from L (50) in order to express the number 40, and then I (1) is subtracted from 40 to represent 39.
You cannot because no Roman numeral would include 5 "x"s.
The Roman numeral "ii" represents the number 2. In the Roman numeral system, the letters "i" represents 1, and when it is repeated, it indicates addition. So, "ii" is the equivalent of adding two "i"s together to represent the number 2.
1. Roman numeral system does not follow the place value system like decimal system. 2. the numerals if written at left or right of a bigger numeral get subtracted or added, but in decimal system this type of confusion is not there. rks_21269@yahoo.com
The name Claudio cannot be formed from Roman numerals as, even if you replaced the letter 'u' with the numeral V, there is no Roman numeral with the symbol 'a.'