D equals 500 and M equals 1,000. A smaller numeral in front of a larger numeral means you subtract the smaller number from the larger one. In this case, DM stands for 500. However, Roman Numerals should be written using the least amount of letters possible. In that case, DM is not a Roman Numeral. In its place is D, also meaning 500.
500
100 - 500
500 - 1000
500-100
1500
²l
DM
50 is an Arabic numeral and its Roman equivalent is L
The Roman numeral of CCLI is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 251
MMCVI is not an Arabic numeral. It is the Roman numeral for 2106.
It's already an Arabic numeral
The Arabic numeral eqivelent of 1776 is 1776. the Roman numeral for 1776 is MDCCLXXVI.
50 is an Arabic numeral and its Roman equivalent is L
The Roman numeral of CCLI is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 251
MMCVI is not an Arabic numeral. It is the Roman numeral for 2106.
It's already an Arabic numeral
Exactly as it is 27 which is an Hindu-Arabic numeral and as a Roman numeral it is XXVII
It is the Hindu-Arabic numeral system.
The Arabic numeral eqivelent of 1776 is 1776. the Roman numeral for 1776 is MDCCLXXVI.
The Roman numeral of CCCL is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 350
The equivalent Roman numeral of L as an Hidu-Arabic numeral is 50
The Roman numeral of CCLX is equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numeral of 260
The Roman numeral of CCLXII is equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numeral of 262
The question doesn't make any sense. Do you mean what is the Arabic number corresponding to the Roman numeral DM? he Romans themselves didn't use shortcuts, and DM would just be 1500 (as would MD ... order didn't matter, you just added up the values). Under the shortcut rules developed in the middle ages, DM would be D less than M. The problem is that no one would write it that way; since D is 500 and M is 1000, DM is exactly the same as the simpler and shorter D.