In today's notation of Roman numerals it represents 19
That is not a proper Roman Numeral
In Roman numerals, "XL" represents 40, and "X" represents 10. When these are combined, XLX represents 40 + 10 + 10, which simplifies to 60. Therefore, the value of XLX in Roman numerals is 60.
It simplifies to 50 because -X+L+X = L which is equivalent to 50
The Roman numerals XLX (-X+L+X = L) would amount to 50.
Nonsense. XLX would mean 50 - 10 + 10 which is 50. The correct writing would be L If you mean XIX, then it would be 19.
That is not a proper Roman Numeral
In Roman numerals, "XL" represents 40, and "X" represents 10. When these are combined, XLX represents 40 + 10 + 10, which simplifies to 60. Therefore, the value of XLX in Roman numerals is 60.
It simplifies to 50 because -X+L+X = L which is equivalent to 50
The Roman numerals XLX (-X+L+X = L) would amount to 50.
Nonsense. XLX would mean 50 - 10 + 10 which is 50. The correct writing would be L If you mean XIX, then it would be 19.
the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI
XXV is the Roman Numeral for 25
No, K is not a roman numeral.
There is not a Roman Numeral for 0.
The roman numeral for one is I.
Vivid is not a Roman numeral
V is a roman numeral representing the number 5.