In today's notation of Roman numerals it represents 19
That is not a proper Roman Numeral
In Roman numerals, "XL" represents 40, and "X" represents 10. When these are combined, XLX represents 40 + 10 + 10, which simplifies to 60. Therefore, the value of XLX in Roman numerals is 60.
It simplifies to 50 because -X+L+X = L which is equivalent to 50
The Roman numerals XLX (-X+L+X = L) would amount to 50.
Nonsense. XLX would mean 50 - 10 + 10 which is 50. The correct writing would be L If you mean XIX, then it would be 19.
That is not a proper Roman Numeral
In Roman numerals, "XL" represents 40, and "X" represents 10. When these are combined, XLX represents 40 + 10 + 10, which simplifies to 60. Therefore, the value of XLX in Roman numerals is 60.
It simplifies to 50 because -X+L+X = L which is equivalent to 50
The Roman numerals XLX (-X+L+X = L) would amount to 50.
Nonsense. XLX would mean 50 - 10 + 10 which is 50. The correct writing would be L If you mean XIX, then it would be 19.
the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI
XXV is the Roman Numeral for 25
324 written in roman numeral is CCCXXIV
Vivid is not a Roman numeral
No, K is not a roman numeral.
The roman numeral for one is I.
There is not a Roman Numeral for 0.