There are many methods to representing Roman Numerals.
The one you have written is an alternate form of expressing the value for 8.
Although the commonly accepted modern method would be shown as VIII, IIX is a valid representation of Roman Numerals and historically was often used as well - and is therefore accurate.
In simpler terms, it's the symbol for the number 8.
Chat with our AI personalities
That is not a correctly formed Roman Numeral. It could be meant to be an 8.
LLX and IIX both aren't roman numerals. L is 50. LL would be 100 but C is 100. IIX would be 8 but VIII is 8.
It is not a valid Roman numeral
The Roman numeral for 8 is VIII V being 5, and III being 3. Each I standing in the place of a 1. There is an often made mistake that 8 is IIX. This is incorrect.
Sorry there is no 'R' in roman numeral