In Roman numerals XXL is the equivalent of 30 because they mean -20+50 = 30
i thing it like 130Improved :-It is XXL = XXX = 30
XXL is not a valid roman numeral.
XXL is not a valid numeral. You can use X (10) and XL (40), or you can use XX (20) and L (50), but you cannot use XXL.
It is equivalent to: XXX = 30 in Roman numerals. It also means extra, extra large.
In Roman numerals XXL is the equivalent of 30 because they mean -20+50 = 30
i thing it like 130Improved :-It is XXL = XXX = 30
XXL is not a valid roman numeral.
XXL is not a valid numeral. You can use X (10) and XL (40), or you can use XX (20) and L (50), but you cannot use XXL.
It is equivalent to: XXX = 30 in Roman numerals. It also means extra, extra large.
It depends. Do you mean 3X as in 3 times X or do you mean 3 subtracted from X? (By the way, roman numerals are always capitalized) If you mean the former, then 3X is 30 which is equal to XXL (L being 50 and XX being the 20 subtracted from it). If you mean the latter, the 3X = 7 which is not equal to XXL or 30.
XXI = 21
It is technically not a valid Roman numeral.Proper Roman numerals proceed in descending order unless it's a "subtractive" numeral. Subtractive numerals are alwayspaired with a larger numeral. And if used as a subtractive numeral, the subtracting character should not appear elsewhere. XXL is invalid because it violates at least two rules. Two X's (10) occur before the larger L (50), and a second X exists with the XL (40) subtractive pair.The following arrangements are valid:XL (50 - 10 = 40) is valid (XL is a subtractive pair)MCM (1000 + (1000 - 100)) = 1900) is valid (1000 > 900, and CM is a subtractive pair).
XXL = 50
Actually, I think it is meant to "represent" the size, in the sense that huge NFL athletes have to wear XXL sized clothing to house their huge muscles. Which is not to say that it states the size of that particular shirt.
Those Roman Numerals mean 1991.
it means 1,150 in roman numerals