because not all people know what roman numeral is and it's quiet hard to learn it.
No, the Roman Numerals are a based less number system.
Roman numerals are used as numbers. For example, the roman numeral for the number one is an I. The system can be used for any number.
Spend a day using only roman numerals instead of Arabic numerals. The disadvantages will become painfully obvious.
The number 23 in Roman numerals is XXIII. The number 00 has no equivalent in Roman numerals as the had no symbol to represent 0, they didn't need one in their system. The number 2300 in Roman numerals would be MMCCC
LVI is already in Roman numerals, but written in the current number system, it's 56.
No, the Roman Numerals are a based less number system.
Roman Numerals
Roman numerals are used as numbers. For example, the roman numeral for the number one is an I. The system can be used for any number.
Spend a day using only roman numerals instead of Arabic numerals. The disadvantages will become painfully obvious.
The number 06 in Roman numerals is represented as VI. It signifies the value of 6 in the Roman numeral system.
Roman numerals is one of them
The number 23 in Roman numerals is XXIII. The number 00 has no equivalent in Roman numerals as the had no symbol to represent 0, they didn't need one in their system. The number 2300 in Roman numerals would be MMCCC
LVI is already in Roman numerals, but written in the current number system, it's 56.
It was the only number system when it was invented
The number "0" does not have a specific representation in Roman numerals. Roman numerals were based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols, so there was no need for a symbol to represent zero.
The number zero does not have a significance in Roman numerals because the Romans did not have a symbol for zero. Roman numerals are based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols to represent numbers.
The number one is I in roman numerals.