Yes.
Acts:1:13: And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James.
Acts:2:4: And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
There are four Philips mentioned in the Bible:**'Philip, the apostle': Matthew 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:14; John 1:43-49; Acts 1:13; ; John 6:5-8; John 12:21-22; John 6:5-7; 13:36+37; 14:8+9.**'Philip the Evangelizer' : Acts 21:8; Acts 6:5; Acts 8:4-13+26-40.**Philip, Herod's half-brother: Matthew 14:3; Mark 6:17**Philip, son of Herod the Great and Cleopatra: Luke 3:1-3
The bible speaks of Philip meeting the Ethiopaen eunech
Answer: The closest to this is the New Testament evangelist Philip who had four. According to Acts 21 verses 8 - 9 " ....we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist....the same man had four daughters, ...... which did prophecy."
The man you're thinking of is Philip. (The New Testament never actually calls him an apostle, but his works fit the definition of the word.)Acts 8:38-40 - So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him. Now when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught Philip away, so that the eunuch saw him no more; and he went on his way rejoicing. But Philip was found at Azotus. And passing through, he preached in all the cities till he came to Caesarea. [NKJV]
Yes the apostle Luke wrote the book of Acts.
There are four Philips mentioned in the Bible:**'Philip, the apostle': Matthew 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:14; John 1:43-49; Acts 1:13; ; John 6:5-8; John 12:21-22; John 6:5-7; 13:36+37; 14:8+9.**'Philip the Evangelizer' : Acts 21:8; Acts 6:5; Acts 8:4-13+26-40.**Philip, Herod's half-brother: Matthew 14:3; Mark 6:17**Philip, son of Herod the Great and Cleopatra: Luke 3:1-3
Acts 8:35 shows that it was Philip the Deacon.
It was Philip. And the scriptural reference is: Acts 8:26-38
Scripturally, there is no reason to think they are the same person.The very purpose of choosing men to be deacons was so that the apostles could devote themselves to "the word of God" rather than "serving tables" (Acts 6:2). It's quite a stretch to imagine the apostle Philip "stepping down" from the apostleship into the role of deacon and itinerant evangelist.Also, as the deacons are introduced by name in Acts 6:5, Stephen is prominent, then Philip and the others. If Philip were the apostle, he would be prominent. Also, the manner of presentation is clear that these men are being newly introduced to scripture.In the following verse, the seven are "set before the apostles" to be commissioned. There's a clear distinction between the apostles and the deacons which further denies that Philip the apostle and Philip the deacon are the same person. All evidence is that they were two different men.
The real name of Saint Philip the Apostle was Philip. He was one of the Twelve Apostles chosen by Jesus in the New Testament.
Yes he did (Acts 8:5-13).
Yes, Philip the Apostle was indeed from Bethsaida in Galilee. He is often referred to as "Philip of Bethsaida" to distinguish him from the other Philip mentioned in the Bible.
Philip the Apostle should not be confused with Philip the Evangelist. Philip the Apostle is said to have been crucified upside down in the city of Hierapolis. So like Jesus he died on a cross.
philip
Philip
wash feets
The Bible does not say.