"IIV" is not a valid representation in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, the correct representation of the number 7 is "VII," which is a combination of the symbols for 5 (V) and 2 (II). The subtractive principle in Roman numerals dictates that a smaller numeral before a larger one indicates subtraction, not addition.
Although IIV superficially looks like a Roman numeral, it isn't. It means nothing in terms of Roman numerals. You could interpret it as the number 3 since V is 5, and the II is two and if you place a smaller number to the left of a larger number it means subtraction, however, that is not the way you write 3 in Roman numerals, since it is much simpler to write it as III.
You have already given it in Roman numerals
Under today's rules the Roman numerals CMXLVII represent 947.
1910
"IIV" is not a valid representation in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, the correct representation of the number 7 is "VII," which is a combination of the symbols for 5 (V) and 2 (II). The subtractive principle in Roman numerals dictates that a smaller numeral before a larger one indicates subtraction, not addition.
Although IIV superficially looks like a Roman numeral, it isn't. It means nothing in terms of Roman numerals. You could interpret it as the number 3 since V is 5, and the II is two and if you place a smaller number to the left of a larger number it means subtraction, however, that is not the way you write 3 in Roman numerals, since it is much simpler to write it as III.
You have already given it in Roman numerals
They are meaningless because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
Under today's rules the Roman numerals CMXLVII represent 947.
It is nothing. That is not a roman numeral!
365
190
1,915
1910
399
1907