Oh, dude, IIV doesn't actually represent anything in Roman numerals. It's like trying to make fetch happen, it's just not gonna work. In Roman numerals, you'd write 7 as VII, not IIV. So, like, nice try, but not quite there.
Although IIV superficially looks like a Roman numeral, it isn't. It means nothing in terms of Roman numerals. You could interpret it as the number 3 since V is 5, and the II is two and if you place a smaller number to the left of a larger number it means subtraction, however, that is not the way you write 3 in Roman numerals, since it is much simpler to write it as III.
You have already given it in Roman numerals
In Roman numerals, MMMD is MMMD. In Hindu-Arabic numerals, it is 3500.
Under today's rules the Roman numerals CMXLVII represent 947.
Oh, dude, IIV doesn't actually represent anything in Roman numerals. It's like trying to make fetch happen, it's just not gonna work. In Roman numerals, you'd write 7 as VII, not IIV. So, like, nice try, but not quite there.
Although IIV superficially looks like a Roman numeral, it isn't. It means nothing in terms of Roman numerals. You could interpret it as the number 3 since V is 5, and the II is two and if you place a smaller number to the left of a larger number it means subtraction, however, that is not the way you write 3 in Roman numerals, since it is much simpler to write it as III.
You have already given it in Roman numerals
In Roman numerals, MMMD is MMMD. In Hindu-Arabic numerals, it is 3500.
They are meaningless because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
Under today's rules the Roman numerals CMXLVII represent 947.
It is nothing. That is not a roman numeral!
399
190
1,915
1955
365