The tradition, which comes from Papias who wrote in about AD 120, is that Mark got his information from Peter. Mark was also the first Bishop of Alexandria, and was ordained and sent there by the Apostle Peter.
Not all biblical scholars follow Papias as seeing the disciple Mark as the real author of the Gospel that now bears his name. Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says, "Mark seems to depend on traditions (and perhaps already shaped sources) received in Greek." He also says that parallels have been detected between Mark and Paul's letter to the Romans, thus suggesting a possible source.
As to what the Greek traditions were that Father Brown spoke of, Dennis R MacDonald (The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark) has developed a credible theory that this was the result of Homeric influence, with Jesus a counterpart to Odysseus. This theory has not been widely accepted by scholars.
Another AnswerPeter was a source, along with Mark's own experiences and observations.
Chat with our AI personalities
They are the Gospel of Matthew,Gospel of Mark,Gospel of Luke,and the Gospel of John.
Mark was one of the writers of the Gospel accounts. The Gospel according to Mark is the second one.
AnswerThe Gospel According to Luke follows after Mark's Gospel.
We do not know the real name of the author of Mark's Gospel, but because the second-century Church Fathers attributed the Gospel to the apostle Mark, we continue to refer to the author as Mark the evangelist.
The gospel now known as the Gospel According to Mark was attributed to Mark later in the second century, although it was originally written anonymously. In spite of this attribution, there is no good reason to believe that John Mark was actually the author of this gospel.