The tradition, which comes from Papias who wrote in about AD 120, is that Mark got his information from Peter. Mark was also the first Bishop of Alexandria, and was ordained and sent there by the Apostle Peter.
Not all biblical scholars follow Papias as seeing the disciple Mark as the real author of the Gospel that now bears his name. Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says, "Mark seems to depend on traditions (and perhaps already shaped sources) received in Greek." He also says that parallels have been detected between Mark and Paul's letter to the Romans, thus suggesting a possible source.
As to what the Greek traditions were that Father Brown spoke of, Dennis R MacDonald (The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark) has developed a credible theory that this was the result of Homeric influence, with Jesus a counterpart to Odysseus. This theory has not been widely accepted by scholars.
Another AnswerPeter was a source, along with Mark's own experiences and observations.
They are the Gospel of Matthew,Gospel of Mark,Gospel of Luke,and the Gospel of John.
Mark was one of the writers of the Gospel accounts. The Gospel according to Mark is the second one.
AnswerThe Gospel According to Luke follows after Mark's Gospel.
We do not know the real name of the author of Mark's Gospel, but because the second-century Church Fathers attributed the Gospel to the apostle Mark, we continue to refer to the author as Mark the evangelist.
The gospel now known as the Gospel According to Mark was attributed to Mark later in the second century, although it was originally written anonymously. In spite of this attribution, there is no good reason to believe that John Mark was actually the author of this gospel.
He wrote the second, the Gospel of Mark.
A:The Bible does not say how or where Mark got his information ofr the Gospel that bears his name, in fact the Bible does not even attribute this gospel to Mark, the companion of the apostle Paul. It was not until around 130 CE that Papias, bishop of Hieropolis named Mark as the author of the gospel and the 'interpreter' of Peter, presumably as if Mark had written from Peter's memory and notes as his secretary. However, Papias could claim no scriptural support for his attribution to Mark nor for his claim that Mark learnt from Peter.
They are the Gospel of Matthew,Gospel of Mark,Gospel of Luke,and the Gospel of John.
Mark was one of the writers of the Gospel accounts. The Gospel according to Mark is the second one.
The gospel according to Mark is independent of the gospel according to Thomas. The Gospel according to Mark is the second of the four found in the New Testament. This gospel relates the story and experiences in the life of Jesus Christ. The Gospel according to Thomas is described by many scholars as being a tribute to oral tradition. Instead of containing information about the actual life of Jesus Christ, it is said to be an actual account of Jesusâ??s own words and teachings.
Mark's Gospel is probably taught to no greater extent than the other gospels, but it is possibly studied more by scholars.Because Mark's Gospel is the earliest gospel in the New Testament, it can provide information about the beliefs of the very earliest Christians. A careful comparison of Mark to the other gospels can also provide clues about the development of those gospels, based on subtle changes their authors made when copying material from Mark.
Mark 1:15:1) the Kingdom of God is at hand...2) repent ye...3) believe the good news [gospel].
Secret Gospel of Mark was born on 1915-05-29.
AnswerThe Gospel According to Luke follows after Mark's Gospel.
The Gospel of Mark is located in the New Testament. It is the second Gospel; in order they go Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
AnswerThe Gospel of Mark does not mention the pregnancy of Mary nor the birth of Jesus.
AnswerIt is known that the authors of Mathew's Gospel and Luke's Gospel relied on Mark's Gospel for their information about the life and mission of Jesus. Whenever they agree with Mark, the text is almost identical in the Greek language. Also, the "Missing Block" proves that the author of Luke knew nothing about Jesus apart from what he found in Mark. Both Matthew and Luke also relied on a hypothetical 'Q' document, also written in Greek, for many of the sayings and parables attributed to Jesus.The link between John's Gospel and Mark is less direct. The author of this Gospel drew mainly from Luke's Gospel, often changing or reversing material form Luke, thus relying indirectly on Mark's Gospel. He also used some material directly from Mark, so both gospels must have been known to him.