The second type of letter application is always better than the first simply because you have improved the overall content.
A flat organization is better than a tall one because there is an easier flow of communication laterally rather than vertically. Also if it is flat there is less bureaucracy to go through.
Prepare, a little pesticide is better than losing your entire crop. A $20 flu shot is better than being hospitalized by severe flu..... Safely placing the candle away from flammable is better than rebuilding your burnt down house.
If that was the case then there would be a lot more women managers than men, but it is not the case.
If you are asking about Project Management certifications like PMP and comparing it with ITIL, then PMP is better than ITIL
It depends completely on the circumstances.
The successful development of various modes of transportation has definitely led to the de-centralization of the population. Because it is easier to travel long distances, there are more instances of people living much further than their work places, and further apart from any nearby homes.
Be honest about which is the problem first , which is more important to change , then decide.
EMP: when you use embedded systems, it would be better to better off since it's focus on a particular task than multiple tasks.
Some people prefer working with fractions to working with percentages (I do) while others prefer things the other way round. If you are reasonably competent , then there are no circumstances when one is better than the other.
1) When you do not need a current tax deduction, a capital works better, you can take depreciation over the term of the lease. 2) You buy a appreciating asset and lease a depreciating asset, A capital lease is better with a depreciating asset. http://www.equipmentleasing101.com
The right type of mortgage rate depends on many factors based on the individuals circumstances so it is difficult to say if their rates are better overall. You can compare pricing on quickenloans.com.
They lived in relatively good circumstances, with a varied diet better than most Europeans. That lasted until Europeans started to take over their land.
In general terms, any "de facto" decentralization is an increase in freedom and initiative (and, at the same time, responsibility) for private businesses and individuals that is not the result of any governmental decision or policy. The increase is "a matter of fact" (as signified by the Latin words, "de facto") rather than formally decided up and worked towards.
The difference between a centralized and a decentralized system of organization is that in a centralized structure all the decision making and authority are focused on the top tier of management. These few people are the ones that dictate company policy and make all the crucial decisions. A decentralized system, on the other hand, delegates authority throughout the organization and to all levels of management. Very often the methods used will depend on a variety of influences such as the size of the company and if it is scattered in a variety of places rather than all under one roof. In a huge organization with many diversifications, like General Motors, for example, there is more likely to be evidence of a decentralized system because it would be impossible and impractical for only a handful of people to ensure that every aspect of the operation was covered. Advantages of centralization include an organization's ability to be able to keep a tight grip on all aspects of the business. In a smaller business where centralization is possible, there is less chance that employees will be unaware of what is expected and what the common goals are because there is such a tight grip on all aspects of the organization from management. An advantage of decentralization is that there tends to be faster decision making and an ability to adapt to the demographic area of production. It also means that lower level managers have the opportunity to gain valuable experience and develop more fully because there is more room to grow.
"It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness" is a saying that refers to being proactive, rather than just lamenting bad circumstances. The saying comes from Amnesty International founder, Peter Benenson, during a speech in 1961. He got the idea from a few phrases in the Bible.
We look at other people's lives and think that they are always 'doing better than we are'. Other peoples circumstances always seen to be more desirable than one's own