0
If all Bloops are Razzies and all Razzies are Lazzies all Bloops are definitely Lazzies?
False!
Bloop = Razzies
Razzies = Lazzies
Bloopers....?
What else can I help you with?
If all Bloops are Razzies and all Razzies are Lazzies all Bloops are definitely Lazzies (a) True (b) False?
true
If all bloops are razzies are lazzies all bloops are definitely lazzies?
If all bloops are razzies and all razzies are lazzies, then by the transitive property, it follows that all bloops are indeed lazzies. This logical structure relies on the relationships between the categories. Therefore, the statement is true based on the given premises.
If blogs are razzies and all the razzies are lazzies are blogs lazzies?
yes
If all Bloops are Razzes and all Razzes are Lazies then all Bloops are definitely Lazies?
False!Bloop = RazziesRazzies = LazziesBloopers....?
If all bloops are razzes and all razzes are lazes are all bloops lazes?
Yes, if all bloops are razzes and all razzes are lazes, then it follows logically that all bloops are lazes. This is an example of a syllogism in logic, where the relationships between the categories lead to a conclusion. Therefore, every bloop must also be a laze.
If all Plags are Plogs and all Plogs are Tregs then all Plags are definitely Tregs?
The answer is True. Of course All plags are definitely Tregs!!!!
Can you please explain how if all bloobs are toogs and no toogs are goopers then you can be certain that no goopers are bloobs is true?
Consider a bloob. Because it is a bloob, and ALL bloops are toogs, it must also be a toog. But if it is a toog then, because no toogs are goopers, it cannot be a gooper. So if it a bloob it cannot be a gooper. That is to say no gooper can be a bloob.
Are all snakes brown?
definitely not!
Does all and off rhyme?
Definitely not.
Are all parents idiots?
Definitely not
Then all Zips are definitely Zonkers?
True
Do all girls wear bras?
No. Definitely not.
