answersLogoWhite

0

Transformational Generative Grammar posits that there is a deep structure to every sentence. TGG deep structure sentences must have 3 characteristics: active voice, statement, positive. Therefore, we must put sentences in this format and back trace to the original statement using the following transformations:

Subject Verb Agreement (The subject needs to agree with the form of the verb)

Affix (The verb needs to be conjugated according to tense)

Subject Verb Inversion (If it's a question)

"Do" (Add "do" if it is a yes/no question)

Negative (Add "not" if it's negative)

Passive (Apply passice voice)

Reflexive (Add appropriate reflexive pronoun)

Imperative (Use correct verb form in imperative tense)

WH questions (Add "WH" adverb according to what's needed)

Contraction (Apply contraction "n't" if applicable)

Tag questions (Apply subject, tense, and an auxiliary verb to tag question; and make subject a pronoun)

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
More answers

Transformational generative grammar focuses on generating all possible grammatical sentences in a language using transformation rules. It includes deep and surface structure levels to capture underlying meaning and surface syntax of sentences. It also introduces transformational rules to account for syntactic transformations between deep and surface structures.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

11mo ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the features of transformational generative grammar?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Linguistics

What ate the characteristics of transformational generative grammar?

Transformational generative grammar is a theory of grammar that aims to explain how native speakers generate and understand sentences. It focuses on transformational rules that generate sentences and transform them into different forms. This theory emphasizes the innate knowledge of language in humans and the idea that there is a universal grammar underlying all languages.


What are the main comparison between Systemic-Functional Grammar and Transformational-Generative Grammar?

Systemic-Functional Grammar focuses on how language is used to convey meaning in different contexts, while Transformational-Generative Grammar focuses on the underlying structure of language and how sentences are generated. Systemic-Functional Grammar emphasizes the social function of language, whereas Transformational-Generative Grammar is more concerned with the universal rules that govern language.


What are the main differences between systemic functional grammar and transformational generative grammar?

Systemic Functional Grammar focuses on the grammatical structures in relation to their function in communication, emphasizing the role of context and meaning. Transformational Generative Grammar, on the other hand, focuses on the underlying abstract rules and structures that generate grammatical sentences. Systemic Functional Grammar is more concerned with how language is used in context, while Transformational Generative Grammar is more concerned with the abstract rules that govern language.


How does Transformational generative grammar relate to contrastive analysis?

Transformational generative grammar and contrastive analysis both focus on comparing and contrasting different languages to understand their structures and systems. Transformational generative grammar seeks to uncover the underlying universal principles that govern language structure, while contrastive analysis compares the target language with the learner's native language to predict and explain potential difficulties in learning. Both approaches strive to enhance linguistic understanding and language learning processes.


Did structural grammar become popular fifty years before transformational grammar?

Yes, structural grammar became popular in the early 20th century, while transformational grammar gained popularity in the mid-20th century, about thirty to forty years later.