The ancient Roman baths were green because the pianting of the baths tubs were green so there for the reflection of the water would make it look as if the h2o was green but yet is was not.
No effect. After the fall of the Roman Empire the Roman baths fell into disuse and there were no baths in Europe for many centuries. Modern baths are based on modern plumbing. Modern public baths do not have a cold-plunge baths, a sauna, a gym and massage like the Roman baths.
Roman baths did not, as the question implies make things "worse". Ancient Roman baths were built first in Rome and later became a part of all large Roman cities and in cities Rome conquered that were deemed large enough to have them. Wealthy Romans often had their own private baths. Many Roman cities and conquered ones had indoor plumbing fed by waters carried in from Roman built aqueducts. Public baths were in a sense part of Roman genius and part of Roman culture. Some of the baths were fed by natural spring waters. The baths in some places were so sophisticated that they were heated. The baths were ideal for Roman citizens who could not afford private ones. The baths served not only as a place to keep clean, but were also recreational and a place for people to gather and meet.
Nowadays the Roman baths are archaeological sites and tourist attractions.
Yes, Romans did build the roman baths...if they didn't, it wouldn't be called ''Roman-Bath''
Roman baths were used to take baths in, the women had a seporate bath room to the men. The women would share a big bath. The men would share a different one.
The ancient Roman baths were green because the pianting of the baths tubs were green so there for the reflection of the water would make it look as if the h2o was green but yet is was not.
yes i think so
No effect. After the fall of the Roman Empire the Roman baths fell into disuse and there were no baths in Europe for many centuries. Modern baths are based on modern plumbing. Modern public baths do not have a cold-plunge baths, a sauna, a gym and massage like the Roman baths.
There were Roman baths all around the Roman empire. They were usually found in Forums of big cities, like the one in the city Rome.
The name of the Roman baths was thermae. Only in the city of Rome, where there were many baths, there were distinctive names for baths: the Baths of Agrippa, the Baths of Nero, the Thermae Etrusci, the Baths of Titus, the Baths of Domitian, the Baths of Trajan, the Baths of Caracalla and the Baths of Diocletian. Thermae Etrusci is a term coined by historians. They were commissioned by Claudius Etruscus, a freedman at the court of the emperor Claudius who became the head of the imperial financial administration.
Roman baths did not, as the question implies make things "worse". Ancient Roman baths were built first in Rome and later became a part of all large Roman cities and in cities Rome conquered that were deemed large enough to have them. Wealthy Romans often had their own private baths. Many Roman cities and conquered ones had indoor plumbing fed by waters carried in from Roman built aqueducts. Public baths were in a sense part of Roman genius and part of Roman culture. Some of the baths were fed by natural spring waters. The baths in some places were so sophisticated that they were heated. The baths were ideal for Roman citizens who could not afford private ones. The baths served not only as a place to keep clean, but were also recreational and a place for people to gather and meet.
Nowadays the Roman baths are archaeological sites and tourist attractions.
Yes, Romans did build the roman baths...if they didn't, it wouldn't be called ''Roman-Bath''
gladiators ate mc donalds with a large big mac meal and fanta as a drink.
The colors of the roman baths are...... Pink- hot Green- cold Purple- warm
Everyone in Roman Society. Large cities had public baths that was open to all.