because they both lick cock
wow. That was a mature answer was it not?? Anywho, Greek and Roman architecture were similar in that they both used coumns. The only difference was that the Romans added the arch and dome. Also, the Greeks built facilities such as the ampitheater. The Romans were more upscale seeing as they built the Coloseum of Rome.
Both of those answers suck. The question wasn't 'how Greek and Roman architecture were similar' , it was 'WHY Greek and Roman architecture were similar.'
-___________-
Chat with our AI personalities
They both use nearly the same kinds of rocks and materials, and they are carved nearly the same. Same as temples. But some of the carvings and those things have some meanings. So I am sure that those stuff are different.
There were many Greek city-states established i Italy before Rome expanded to take over the peninsula (eg Naples was Greek, name came from the Greek nea = new, polis = city). When the Romans absorbed these cities, it also absorbed much of their culture, including architecture.
Roman architecture focused on creating inside spaces and practicality. Greek architecture as seen in Constantinople was more ornate and focused on the outside.
No, Greek technology was not similar Roman technology. Rome might have had one Greek technology that they used, but other then that one Greek technology, Roman technology was not similar to Greek technology.
They were both concerned with expanding their empires They both only allowed males to vote. They had very similar religions.
No, it is called Federalist which used elements,of Greek buildings.