Because of a long legal process and resistance from the railroads, until 1897, when Supreme Court ruled that it could not set maximum railroad rates.
A system of commerce where several companies work together to control competition and prices is called a cartel. OPEC is an example of this principle.
The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 aimed to regulate railroad rates and practices, addressing concerns over monopolistic control and unfair pricing in the transportation industry. Similarly, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 sought to combat anti-competitive practices by prohibiting monopolies and restraining trade. Both laws were significant steps taken by the federal government to curtail the excessive power of big businesses and promote fair competition in the marketplace. Together, they laid the groundwork for future regulatory measures to protect consumers and smaller enterprises.
To be legal for interstate travel with no extra permits the legal limit is 80,000 lbs. 20,000 lbs on single axles, 34,000 on dual axles. 12,000 on the steer axle .
The Han government held a generally ambivalent view toward commerce and merchants, often considering them less prestigious than agricultural work. While recognizing the economic importance of trade for prosperity, officials viewed merchants as profit-driven and sometimes unscrupulous. This perception led to policies that aimed to regulate commerce and limit the power of merchants, reflecting a Confucian ideal that prioritized agriculture and the moral value of the land over trade.
Federal legislation passed in 1890 prohibiting "monopolies or attempts to monopolize" and "contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade" in interstate and foreign commerce. The major purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act was to prohibit monopolies and sustain competition so as to protect companies from each other and to protect consumers from unfair business practices. The act was supplemented by the clayton antitrust act in 1914. Both acts are enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Attorney General's office. (source: answers.com)
Because of a long legal process and resistance from the railroads, until 1897, when Supreme Court ruled that it could not set maximum railroad rates.
Because of a long legal process and resistance from the railroads, until 1897, when Supreme Court ruled that it could not set maximum railroad rates.
The ICC and Railroads have always had a long and fascinating relationship. They have demanded safety appliances such as standard brake equipment and handrails. They have been the final decision maker when it comes to Railroad mergers, the Southern Pacific/ Santa Fe merger being an outstanding example. Also see: The Heburn (1906) & Staggers (1980) Rail acts. If nobody's written a book on the subject I'd be shocked.
Yes, and anything else imaginable. The Supreme Court only recently (relatively speaking) recognized a limit to Congress' power under the Interstate Commerce Clause in the case of United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).Essentially, the Court held that Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce does not extend to activity that is both "non-economic" and "wholly intrastate." Congress may, on the other hand, regulate the "channels" of commerce (e.g., highways, rivers, railroads, etc.), "instrumentalities" of commerce (e.g., products/services bought and sold in commerce, and the means by which they travel interstate), and those activities which "substantially effect" interstate commerce. To take the Lopez case, for example, banning the mere possession of a gun within 1000 ft. of a school was neither a regulation of a channel or instrumentality of interstate commerce. The government argued that guns in/near schools had a negative effect on education; if education suffers, students won't learn as much; if American students are stupid, they will not perform as well in future jobs; therefore guns near schools have a "substantial effect" on the national economy, and thus also on interstate commerce.The Supreme Court said, "hell no... you've got to be kidding." (That's not a direct quote, just in case you're wondering.)
Yes, the case of U.S. v. Lopez (1995) placed a limit on the national government's authority under the Commerce Clause. The Supreme Court ruled that the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 exceeded Congress's powers because possessing a gun in a school zone did not substantially affect interstate commerce. This decision emphasized the need for a clearer connection between regulated activities and interstate commerce, reinforcing states' rights and limiting federal overreach.
65
60
70
There are several Interstate Highways with a 75 MPH speed limit at various points throughout their span, but there isn't one which has that speed limit at every single point.
50
scalar
The speed limit on Interstate 90 in South Dakota is 80 mph or 128.7 km/h, except in city limits where the speed limit is lower, usually 55 or 65 mph.