Platt Amendment Foraker Act
Imperialist nations were interested in competing for influence without going to war.
The Boer War affected Canada in the way that since Britain was involved in the war, they wanted Canada to send troops to help. Canada became split by the opinions of the English-speaking imperialists, and the French-speaking nationalists. The imperialists believed that Canada should send soldiers immediately to support the Empire. The nationalists did not want to participate at all, and sympathized with the Boers. The prime minister of Canada, Wilfred Laurier, had to compromise by sending 1 000 volunteers to Africa. However, both sides were unhappy with this.
Romanians want to free the Romanian territories invaded by the Austro-Hungarians imperialists.
No. For centuries before and during ww2 Japan had always been imperialists.
Platt Amendment Foraker Act
The main goal of imperialists in Africa was to control more territory without going to war.
To compete for influence without going to war
The main goal of imperialists in Africa was to control more territory without going to war.
Imperialist nations were interested in competing for influence without going to war.
To control more territory without going to war. (APEX Class ;)
The Boer War affected Canada in the way that since Britain was involved in the war, they wanted Canada to send troops to help. Canada became split by the opinions of the English-speaking imperialists, and the French-speaking nationalists. The imperialists believed that Canada should send soldiers immediately to support the Empire. The nationalists did not want to participate at all, and sympathized with the Boers. The prime minister of Canada, Wilfred Laurier, had to compromise by sending 1 000 volunteers to Africa. However, both sides were unhappy with this.
There are zero similarities between the two.
There are zero similarities between the two.
"American Capitalists", "Yankees", "GI's", and "Yankee Imperialists."
Romanians want to free the Romanian territories invaded by the Austro-Hungarians imperialists.
Imperialists believed in the US maintaining control over the Philippines to bring civilization and stability, while anti-imperialists argued against US expansionism and believed in self-determination for the Filipino people. Imperialists viewed the Philippines as a strategic asset and gateway to trade in the Pacific, while anti-imperialists saw it as a violation of American values and principles.