answersLogoWhite

0

They were concerned that getting the government involved would hurt states' rights.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What was whig party argument in support of the building of transportation systems by the federal government?

State governments could not do the job well on their own.


What was a Whig Party argument in support if the building of transportation systems by the federal government?

The Whig Party argued that the federal government should invest in transportation systems to promote economic growth and national unity. They believed that improved infrastructure, such as roads and canals, would facilitate commerce, enhance trade, and connect distant regions, ultimately benefiting the entire nation. This investment was seen as essential for fostering industrial development and expanding markets, thereby strengthening the economy and the federal government's role in promoting the public good.


What is the Anti-Gridlock Act of 1987?

The Anti-Gridlock Act of 1987, also known as the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act, was a US federal law aimed at addressing traffic congestion and promoting efficient transportation systems. It established measures to improve transportation planning, funding, and coordination among federal, state, and local governments. The act also included provisions to assist individuals and businesses affected by transportation projects through relocation assistance.


How many party systems has the US had since 1789?

9 Actually it is six. anti fed - fed democratic and whigs republicans and democrats post civil war republicans and democrats system of 1896 republicans and democrats realignment of the great depression and lastly democratic and republican the one we have in place today


Transportation and communication systems are not highly developed in Latin America for all the following reasons except?

hjklhjkhjk

Related Questions

Why did the Democrats not like using federal money to build transportation systems?

They were concerned that getting the government involved would hurt states' rights.


Why did the century Democrats not like using federal money to build transportation systems?

They were concerned that getting the government involved would hurt states' rights.


Why did 19th-century Democrats like using federal money to build transportation systems?

They were concerned that getting the government involved would hurt states' rights.


Why did the 19th-century democrats not like using federal money to build transportation systems?

They were concerned that getting the government involved would hurt states' rights.


Why did the 19th century democrats not like using federal money to build transportation systems?

They were concerned that getting the government involved would hurt states' rights.


Why did 19th-century democrats of the US oppose using federal money to build transportation systems?

They were concerned that getting the government involved would hurt states' rights.


Why did century democrats not using federal money to build transportation systems?

If you are asking about the 1800's the main system was the railroad and they were built by the investors not by the government. Cars weren't invented so a system of roads wasn't needed until the 1950's and the river systems had boats on them from the very beginning.


What was it Democratic Party argument against the building of transportation systems by the federal government?

The Democratic Party historically argued against federal investment in transportation systems on the grounds of states' rights and the belief that such projects should be managed at the state or local level, rather than by the federal government. They contended that federal involvement could lead to overreach and inefficiency, undermining the autonomy of states. Additionally, some Democrats expressed concerns about the potential for increased debt and government spending that could arise from large federal projects. This stance was often rooted in a preference for limited government intervention in the economy.


Does the federal or state government control transportation?

Transportation in the United States is regulated by both federal and state governments. The federal government oversees interstate transportation, setting national standards and regulations through agencies like the Department of Transportation (DOT). State governments manage intrastate transportation, including local roads and public transit systems, allowing for more localized control. This dual system ensures a coordinated approach to transportation infrastructure and safety.


What was a Whig party argument in support the federal government build transportation systems?

state governments could not do the job well on their own


What was a Whig party argument in support of the building transportation systems by the federal government?

State governments could not do the job well on their own.


What was a Whigs party argument in support of the building of transportation systems by the federal government?

State governments could not do the job well on their own.