Because we believed the people needed liberty from Britain, the were unfairly taxing the colonists, and were taking away their unalienable rights.
_____________________________________
New answer:
Unalienable rights are rights not granted and therefore cannot be taken away:
Hamilton did not choose to fight on the side of the colonists. Here are some excerpts from my book The Never Realized Republic: Political Economy and Republican Virtue. (Check out a different answer here: http://wiki.answers.com/What_did_the_founding_fathers_take_from_England_while_forming_a_new_government.
...When Hamilton arrived in America in 1772 he had learned of the colonies' controversy first-hand by enlightened "Presbyterian Whig's." "Hamilton would become the first advocate of the Whigs "paranoid mistrust of power"2 The colonists' controversy was a century-old struggle and not a reaction to sudden and contemporary events.3 Not being from those generations, connected by lineage or controversy, Hamilton stepped onto the American stage to witness the effects of a century of controversy, and a perceived fear of arbitrary and often oppressive authority.
This was not unlike his fear of authority, or the natural and civil forces he witnessed as a boy on Nevis, in the British West Indies. From Nevis to Francis Barber, and Kings College, Hamilton responded to his fears. The hurricanes on Nevis, the anarchy of revolution, and the Federalist Papers show fear, not faith. Herein is the difference between Roman virtue, subjugating out of fear of losing liberty, and classical, Christian virtue, and faith in the desire to do good.
Yes he did!
Alexander Hamilton led the fight for ratification with support from John Jay over a 6-week period in Poughkeepsie, NY. It resulted in successful ratification on July 26, 1788 against strong opposition . The 11th state to do so.
the colonists did
The British were taxing the colonists without representation in Parliament.
Some colonists who were too far away to fight became neutralists.
Burr
Yes he did!
If your mean the duel he died in it was Aaron Burr.
The Federalist Party led by Alexander Hamilton.
Alexander Hamilton led the fight for ratification with support from John Jay over a 6-week period in Poughkeepsie, NY. It resulted in successful ratification on July 26, 1788 against strong opposition . The 11th state to do so.
Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. Burr won.
They were long-time political rivals. Eventually is boiled over after Hamilton insulted Burr publically.
Burr was veary angry at Hamilton. Burr was a Democratic/Republican and Hamilton was a Federalist. This meant they already had many differences. Also, Hamilton was saying bad things about Burr, illegally, and it was posted in the news paper. This caused a duel between them both.
Alexander Hamilton's plan for financial review focused on financial stability necessary to fight another war should one arise with the foreign threats of Britain and Spain. Hamilton suggested funding the foreign debt by selling government bonds, and further proposed that state debts be assumed by the national government.
the colonists did
Burr was veary angry at Hamilton. Burr was a Democratic/Republican and Hamilton was a Federalist. This meant they already had many differences. Also, Hamilton was saying bad things about Burr, illegally, and it was posted in the news paper. This caused a duel between them both.
The answer is that Mercy Otis Warren inspired colonists to fight for freedom with his speeches.I AM RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!