The answer is everywhere, the English greatest strength is they are one of the world's great mongrel peoples.
After the ice age, settlers began arriving in Britain sporadically for centuries. At first this wasn't a problemm, but towards the end of the Bronze age the country was becoming quite populated. Proof of this is the fact before the Roman invasion the farmland in Britain was being worked so heavily that not again until the 20th century would the earth be tilled so heavily. Also the emergence of hillforts and substantial archaeologic evidence of fighting in that era show land was at a premium.
Then came the Romans bringing settlers from all over the empire. The Romans had a policy of stationing troops as far from their homelands as possible. African and Arab legions were stationed in Britain during the occupation. Several Roman emperors were also British including Rome's only black emperor Septimus Severus.
The following dark ages saw more migration to Britain from Scandenavia. The Anglo-Saxons and Vikings, these groups could possibly have added upto 20% to the English population at their height making them the single largest migrant in history.
The Normans numbering only 20,000 were largely insignificant, but they opened Britain up to cosmopolitan Europe. By the middle ages Britain had Jews, Turks, French, Libyans all in sizable numbers.
In the Rennaissance the Huegonots made a major migration from France and many of Europe's protestant sought sanctuary.
As the British Empire grew an influx of people from all over the world followed. The by the 1800 there were more Irish in England than Ireland. By by 1850 London had gettos ranging from Malay to Polish, there were even American Indian refugees given asylum.
A survey of Whitechapel in Jack the Ripper times showed 50% of the population were immigrants and of the 50% who weren't virtually all their parents were. The survey estimated less than 20% of the whole population of London could trace their English ancestry back more than 200 years.
In the 20th century the imperial immigrants didn't abate and England to this day still both has and annually accepts more immigrants than every other country in Europe combined.
Today, England has descended from many peoples from all over the world, pre-empire though England was descended from people from northern Germany, Denmark and holland,as well as Celts and french.
In some pictures Annie Oakley does look Black, but she was actually the daughter of two English-descended Quakers.
German is a west Germanic language. It is descended from the proto-Germanic language. For more information, see the links below.
While the proud and noble English surname of Folkes is first found in Norfolk, they are conjecturally descended from Fulco Nerra, the Count of Anjou, in Normandy.
Africans
cleisthenes
No. There is no direct relationship between English and Hebrew. In fact, no present-day languages are descended from Hebrew.
The Angles and Saxons.
No. Her parents were descended from English colonists.
Chocolate is descended from Chocolatl I believe.
English, in fact his family is descended from English nobility
English is 'descended' from Anglo-Saxon and Old French, with several influences from other languages, too. All known languages are 'descended' from other languages, so there is nothing odd about that.
Nationalist: predominantly Catholic, descended from the native (formerly Gaelic-speaking) population. Unionist: predominantly Protestant, descended from Scottish/English colonists in the 1600s who were English-speaking.
Britain originated in the 400's-500's when they got there independence from the Roman Empire.
Yes, Welch and Irish mostly however there is also some English and Scottish in there as well.
German and English are both believed to be descended from the West Germanic branch of the Germanic language family. This common source explains many similarities in their vocabularies, grammar structures, and overall linguistic characteristics.
Both have descended from the Indo-European language family.
He descended from the line of David, not Joseph.He descended from the line of David, not Joseph.He descended from the line of David, not Joseph.He descended from the line of David, not Joseph.He descended from the line of David, not Joseph.He descended from the line of David, not Joseph.