Wiki User
∙ 13y agothe answer to this question is scarcity of fertile land or shortage of labor
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThey didn't have much economic opportunity in the old South.
Bimetallism and fair food prices
True
A. Shays' Rebellion Plato answer
No
They didn't have much economic opportunity in the old South.
They didn't have much economic opportunity in the old South.
Farmers in western Pennsylvania rebelled against paying a tax on their locally distilled whiskey and attacked federal revenue collectors
Many farmers lost their land due to factors such as economic downturns, rising debts, and land consolidation by larger agricultural corporations. Additionally, natural disasters, government policies, and changing market demands can also contribute to farmers losing their land.
it is like Punjabi farmers have got better facilities and government policies but kashmiri farmers have not
No, landholding in villages is typically not uniform among all farmers. It can vary widely depending on factors such as historical inheritance patterns, purchase or lease agreements, government redistribution policies, and socio-economic factors.
Protective tariffs. Apex :)
Economic aid to farmers and landowners
I'm still researching all this myself but look up social policies of the republican government (eg. the scopes 'monkey' trial, prohibition and the KKK) and economic policies (such as laissez faire, tariffs and unions) and then look at the impact it had on groups like women, farmers, African Americans and immigrants. hope that helps :3
Federal goverment
They had to borrow money to buy seed, fertilize, and equipment
He increased the economic power of the government by nationalizing industries and taking control of foreign -owned businesses, including the Suez Canal. He redistributed land to poor farmers and increased the wages of urban workers Nasser's goal was to expand farm output and end economic dependence on West by developing Egypt's industry.