answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A departure from precedent normally only occurs if the precedent in question is thought to be incorrect or inapplicable.

This is particularly evident through the legislatures who subscribe to the Legal Realism frame of thought. These judges are more inclined to take the economic and social realities into account when departing from the precedent. When Civil Rights decisions were being made, it was these Legal Realist that made the dramatic changes in law that occurred during that time.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When might a court depart from precedent?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What precedent did Marbury v. Madison set?

In 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.


How did the precedent of judicial review affect checks and balances?

The precedent of judicial review, as established in the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, affected checks and balances by giving the judicial branch the power to interpret the laws passed by the executive and legislative branches. It also gave the court the power to determine the constitutionality of laws.


Previous rulin in earlier case providing guidance?

In court cases, earlier cases can set what is called a precedent. If the court has delivered a verdict on a particular circumstance, it becomes the rule for future cases.


Where did ships for d-day depart from?

England...................


Has the US Supreme Court ever overruled a former US Supreme Court decision?

Yes, quite a few times. One famous instance in which the Supreme Court overruled its prior precedent was Brown v. Board of Education, the case which held that segregated schools denied African American children equal educational opportunities. In that case, the Court overruled Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) (espousing the infamous "separate but equal" doctrine), relying heavily on findings from social science.The Supreme Court rarely overrules its own precedent, however, and will often find ways to distinguish a case (explain why that prior case is different from the case at bar and why the outcome here should be different) before it overturns it. When the Supreme court does overturn a case, it will usually do so explicitly and explain the rationale for its departure.The Congressional Research Service published a book on the US Constitution in which there were over 100 cases showing that the Supreme Court had overruled itself.

Related questions

Can a court depart from a precedent if the precedent is no longer considered constitutionally valid?

Yes courts can depart from Precedents. However this depends on the level of the court and the precedent being relied upon. For instance the Supreme Court is not bound by any precedent, not even the one it set, yet the lower courts to it are bound by such precedents. Also the precedent being relied upon could have been overtaken by events e.g by change of law, time or any other factor hence making it obsolete and therefore courts departing from such precedent.


What is similar between original intent and court precedent?

Original intent is is a theory in law concerning constitutional and statutory interpretation. Court precedent is English court might cite judgments from countries that share the English common law tradition.


Is court precedent mandatory or persuasive?

That depends on which court you're referring to. In the federal court system, the US Supreme Court sets binding (or mandatory) precedent for all lower courts; the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts set binding precedent for all US District Courts within their jurisdiction, but only persuasive precedent elsewhere; the US District Courts do not set binding precedent at all, they only set persuasive precedent.


Can a court depart from precedents?

Yes.


What is the difference between a binding precedent and a persuasive precedent?

A binding precedent is precedent that a court MUST follow (it is law). All prior judicial decisions in a specific court's jurisdiction heard at that court's level or higher are considered to be binding precedent. In contrast, persuasive precedent is precedent that a court need not follow (it is NOT law, but, as the name suggests, may be persuasive because it suggests a line of reasoning). All prior judicial decisions OUTSIDE of that court's jurisdiction or from a LOWER court are considered to be persuasive only.


What court sets precedent for the entire US?

U.S Supreme Court


Use controlling in a sentence?

A legal precedent is called "controlling" in a court proceeding if the precedent is a decision rendered by a court to which any judgment of the court in which the proceeding is occurring can be appealed, either immediately or ultimately.


What is established by the court ruling of an earlier case?

Precedent


Why were precedent set by the supreme court with Marshall as chief justice?

This was the first sitting Supreme Court of the USA. Every decision made by that court established the original precedent for all subsequent cases in the USA. Perhaps the most important was Marbury vs Madison where the precedent was established for the Supreme Court to review laws for "Constitutionality".


What can a court do if the court decides that a precedent is incorrect or inapplicable?

The court must refuse to decide the particular case.


Why were precedent set by the supreme court with Marshall's as chief justice important?

This was the first sitting Supreme Court of the USA. Every decision made by that court established the original precedent for all subsequent cases in the USA. Perhaps the most important was Marbury vs Madison where the precedent was established for the Supreme Court to review laws for "Constitutionality".


Laws based on court decrees and precedents is?

LAw based on court decrees and precedent is