To try the surviving leading Nazis for war crimes, crimes against peace and against humanity.
In addition, there was a series of follow-up trials at Nuremberg relating to more specialized matters, such as the Doctors' Trial which was concerned, among other things, with the T4 euthanasia program.
The only alternative seriously considered by the Allies was simply to declare the accused guilty and kill them without trial.
Chat with our AI personalities
They were put into place to bring justice out of the chaos of WWII, to establish a sense of morality to an immoral period of time, and to reunite a world in desperate need of reconcilitation (It also was intended as a forum to hang a few genuine war-mongering, sadistic bastards.)
The War Crime trials were held to punish war-criminals .
The Nuremberg trials were a showcase, before much of the politics were involved. They were trials performed by the conquerors, subsequently there would be many trials convened by the Germans themselves.
In Japan the philosophy was much more to assist the country in recognising, coming to terms with and moving on themselves.
No. The nuremberg trials were held after the war, when several of the officers were take to court for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
This refers to the Nuremberg trials. After World War 2, the trails were held to prosecute prominent leaders of Nazi Germany who had committed war crimes and crimes against humanity during the war.
SI: Nazi leaders were brought to trial for war crimes committed during World War II.
Nazi leaders were not brought to justice during the Holocaust. That is why there was able to be a Holocaust. The Nazi leaders who survived were brought to trial after the war and the holocaust was ended. This was done by trying them in an international court of law before a panel of judges from the major allied countries.
Nuremberg