In general terms, the literature of the Renaissance differed from Medieval literature in its general spirit and typical subjects-of-focus. In respect to the former, it was vivacious, energetic, positive, even aggressive -- exuding confidence or curiosity in some significant way -- by contrast with the more reserved, humble, contrite spirit of the preceding age. Subjects-of-focus for the Renaissance differed from Medieval literature in that authors themselves were quite often featured, with their distinctive opinions and characteristics noted; at the same time, this-worldly themes and tensions were prominent, by contrast with the other-worldly or otherwise 'fantastic' themes of the previous age's writing.
There are three main ways that the Renaissance was different from the Middle Ages:
1. Unlike the Middle Ages, the Renaissance was a time of creativity and change. Culture grew, and many famous artists came from that time like Michelangelo and Leonardo de Vinci. New techniques were used in art like perspective, which is used to make objects in a painting appear far and near.
2. Scholars took a new approach to studies. Instead of studying things like death and the nature of life (such as in the middle ages), they studied more "practical" topics. However, they also created a new emphasis on individual achievement.
3. During the Renaissance, curiosity grew, and new lands were explored. Columbus would be the prime example of this. He helped to discover the new world, however, there were many other explorers. Along with geographical discoveries, other discoveries were made in art and science.
The middle ages are called the "Dark Ages" for a reason because people didn't read or write, the society was ruled by superstition and the church, and for a 1000 years there wasn't growth in learning. The word "renaissance" means rebirth and this is what happened. There was a rebirth of the arts, learning, and science. People were going back and looking at the classical world/work of the Greeks and Romans. They were reading and exploring. To compare the two times is like comparing night and day.
The Renaissance (French: rebirth) is the European period following the Middle Ages (Medieval). The big difference was that Europeans of the Renaissance started to value their immediate life more, and started yearning for and digging up the lost cultural achievements of earlier times. That is, they started rediscovering the Roman and Greek architecture, literature, sculpture, etc. This was, in part, a response to the bleak times Europe had suffered during the Black Plague, and, at the same time, due to the fact that since there were fewer people to till the lands, they had to be paid better, and thus they had more money to acquire goods and culture.
The invention of the printing press also helped people to learn all sorts of things, and thus the concept of "Renaissance man" was born: a person whose knowledge spanned various different subjects. Up until one point, it was possible to read all existing books and know "everything there was to know."
fergie said so!
Personally, I would have preferred to have lived during the Middle Ages. One reason is that people in the Renaissance looked down on those of the Middle Ages as barbarians, but the people of the Renaissance were more superstitious and less rational. They pursued witch hunts and suppressed science in ways that were not done in the Middle Ages. Unfortunately, we tend to buy the propaganda of the Renaissance, partly because they were the only ones who could make the comparison - the people of the Middle Ages did not know what was coming. There was a lot of activity in the Middle Ages in engineering, science, philosophy, education, and mathematics that we little of today. The people of the Renaissance tried to work in these fields, but took a less practical and more cosmological point of view, resulting in ecclesiastical suppression. The food and medicine in the High Middle Ages and Late Middle Ages were no worse that that of the Renaissance. The people of the Middle Ages believed that cleanliness was next to godliness, so they were clean. They also believed that bad air, with bad smells, could carry diseases. The people of the Renaissance covered their bad smells with perfume and called the Middle Ages stinky. The people of the Middle Ages believed in their religion and believed a person was no better than his word. The Renaissance produced Macchiavelli and people who thought he was just dandy. One thing the Renaissance had was a greater proportion of houses that had fireplaces and chimneys.
the difference between the renaissance and the middle ages is that the middle ages was a time of survival and religious belives. During the middle ages people still believed in god. Also, there were many raids, and travel was not safe. People focused on getting enough food and survivng in the harsh way of life. The middle ages is known as the dark ages because of how harsh people lived. On the other hand the renaissance was of time of rebith, invention, and bring back the classic ways of the Greek and Roman ideas. People lived in luxury and enjoyed life unlike the people of the medival era, otherwise known as the middle ages.
ii did in ways
There are many ways in which a scientist could reach their conclusion during the middle ages. They could just observe.
Renaissance means rebirth and ended the Middle Ages. After a 1000 years man produced art, massive churches, and began to think in humanist ways.
fergie said so!
Personally, I would have preferred to have lived during the Middle Ages. One reason is that people in the Renaissance looked down on those of the Middle Ages as barbarians, but the people of the Renaissance were more superstitious and less rational. They pursued witch hunts and suppressed science in ways that were not done in the Middle Ages. Unfortunately, we tend to buy the propaganda of the Renaissance, partly because they were the only ones who could make the comparison - the people of the Middle Ages did not know what was coming. There was a lot of activity in the Middle Ages in engineering, science, philosophy, education, and mathematics that we little of today. The people of the Renaissance tried to work in these fields, but took a less practical and more cosmological point of view, resulting in ecclesiastical suppression. The food and medicine in the High Middle Ages and Late Middle Ages were no worse that that of the Renaissance. The people of the Middle Ages believed that cleanliness was next to godliness, so they were clean. They also believed that bad air, with bad smells, could carry diseases. The people of the Renaissance covered their bad smells with perfume and called the Middle Ages stinky. The people of the Middle Ages believed in their religion and believed a person was no better than his word. The Renaissance produced Macchiavelli and people who thought he was just dandy. One thing the Renaissance had was a greater proportion of houses that had fireplaces and chimneys.
the difference between the renaissance and the middle ages is that the middle ages was a time of survival and religious belives. During the middle ages people still believed in god. Also, there were many raids, and travel was not safe. People focused on getting enough food and survivng in the harsh way of life. The middle ages is known as the dark ages because of how harsh people lived. On the other hand the renaissance was of time of rebith, invention, and bring back the classic ways of the Greek and Roman ideas. People lived in luxury and enjoyed life unlike the people of the medival era, otherwise known as the middle ages.
What came after the Dark Ages was the Carolingian Renaissance, the High Middle Ages, or the European Renaissance, depending on your point of view. It seems most who use the term date it from about 450 to 1000 AD. Some give precise dates in 476 to 1066 AD. I have seen the term Dark Ages used to refer to the Age of Migrations, about 300 AD to 700 AD. There was a collapse in learning in the Roman Empire during the time of about 230 AD, and the Carolingian Renaissance began shortly after 700 AD, so this might be a better time to call the Dark Ages. Some historians call the Dark Ages equal to the Middle Ages, but the people of the Middle Ages used the term to refer to an earlier time in the Middle Ages. Also, the period of the Middle Ages after about 700 AD included several times of advanced intellectual activity, so this usage seems wrong in some ways.
the difference between the renaissance and the middle ages is that the middle ages was a time of survival and religious belives. During the middle ages people still believed in god. Also, there were many raids, and travel was not safe. People focused on getting enough food and survivng in the harsh way of life. The middle ages is known as the dark ages because of how harsh people lived. On the other hand the renaissance was of time of rebith, invention, and bring back the classic ways of the Greek and Roman ideas. People lived in luxury and enjoyed life unlike the people of the medival era, otherwise known as the middle ages.
The Renaissance, which was based primarily in northern Italy was significant to Europe. The period advanced European culture in literature, painting and sculpture, along with science. It opened up the way for man's advancement from the Middle Ages.
ii did in ways
There are many ways in which a scientist could reach their conclusion during the middle ages. They could just observe.
b
you need to specify the geographic region you are inquiring about. the most basic answer, about Europe, at least, is the Renaissance. The middle ages were coming to an end, the printing press was being invented, people we re-discovering knowledge gained by the Greeks and Romans, people were re-discovering the arts, architecture, technology, etc etc etc. But if you look elsewhere, you will get a different history, and even the answer of the European Renaissance is too broad, as the Renaissance hit in different times in different places, and the Renaissance itself can be defined in many, many different ways. For instance, in England around 1490-1500 Shakespeare was publishing his plays, but this form of the Renaissance had already taken place and passed in Florence, Italy, were many scholars agree the Renaissance started.
in what ways were the wealthy europeans of the renaissance differnent from the wealthy europeans of feudal times?