0
Most colonists were outraged by the tax because they saw it as an unjust attempt to raise money in the colonies without the consent of the colonists. They did not elect members of Parliament and there was no approval required by the various colonial legislatures. Although the Stamp Act itself was not a harsh measure, colonists feared the standard this new type of legislation would set. "No taxation without representation" became the rallying cry.
The Americans drew a distinction between an internal tax on the colonists (the stamp act) and an external tax on the trade of the colonies. http://wiki.answers.com/primarysources/patrickhenry.htmoffered several anti-stamp act resolutions in the House of Burgesses in Virginia, most of which were passed. Virginia declared that it would not pay taxes which had not been approved by its legislature. The royal governor of Virginia, appointed by the King of Britain, did not approve the resolutions and dissolved the House of Burgesses, precipitating a crisis.
Newspapers attempted to avoid the requirements of the act by issuing sheets without the masthead and other characteristics of a newspaper. In this way they were able to continue publishiing without risk of prosecution for their resistance to the act. One such paper was the http://wiki.answers.com/primarysources/nostamps.htm. On October 31, 1765 the publishers announced the suspension of the Gazette in opposition to the provisions of the Stamp Act which required that it be printed on imported, stamped paper.
In addition to rhetoric, the colonists waged a campaign which included evasion and http://wiki.answers.com/didyouknow/tarringandfeathering.htmto fight the tax and intimidate the tax collectors. No stamp commissioner or tax collector was actually tarred and feathered but by November 1, 1765, the day the Stamp Act tax went into effect, there were no stamp commissioners left in the colonies to collect it.
http://wiki.answers.com/Franklin.htmwas a colonial agent in London at the time and testified before Parliament about the colonies' attitude toward the tax. They were trying to understand the colonists' strong feeling against the tax. Franklin testified:
I never heard any objection to the right of laying duties to regulate
commerce; but a right to lay internal taxes was never supposed to be in
Parliament, as we are not represented there. . . .
The tax was http://wiki.answers.com/primarysources/stampactrepeal.HTMLin 1766 after Franklin's testimony, but it was not the end of the taxation issue.
Most colonists were outraged by the tax because they saw it as an unjust attempt to raise money in the colonies without the consent of the colonists. They did not elect members of Parliament and there was no approval required by the various colonial legislatures. Although the Stamp Act itself was not a harsh measure, colonists feared the standard this new type of legislation would set. "No taxation without representation" became the rallying cry.
The Americans drew a distinction between an internal tax on the colonists (the stamp act) and an external tax on the trade of the colonies. http://wiki.answers.com/primarysources/patrickhenry.htmoffered several anti-stamp act resolutions in the House of Burgesses in Virginia, most of which were passed. Virginia declared that it would not pay taxes which had not been approved by its legislature. The royal governor of Virginia, appointed by the King of Britain, did not approve the resolutions and dissolved the House of Burgesses, precipitating a crisis.
Newspapers attempted to avoid the requirements of the act by issuing sheets without the masthead and other characteristics of a newspaper. In this way they were able to continue publishiing without risk of prosecution for their resistance to the act. One such paper was the http://wiki.answers.com/primarysources/nostamps.htm. On October 31, 1765 the publishers announced the suspension of the Gazette in opposition to the provisions of the Stamp Act which required that it be printed on imported, stamped paper.
In addition to rhetoric, the colonists waged a campaign which included evasion and http://wiki.answers.com/didyouknow/tarringandfeathering.htmto fight the tax and intimidate the tax collectors. No stamp commissioner or tax collector was actually tarred and feathered but by November 1, 1765, the day the Stamp Act tax went into effect, there were no stamp commissioners left in the colonies to collect it.
http://wiki.answers.com/Franklin.htmwas a colonial agent in London at the time and testified before Parliament about the colonies' attitude toward the tax. They were trying to understand the colonists' strong feeling against the tax. Franklin testified:
I never heard any objection to the right of laying duties to regulate
commerce; but a right to lay internal taxes was never supposed to be in
Parliament, as we are not represented there. . . .
The tax was http://wiki.answers.com/primarysources/stampactrepeal.HTMLin 1766 after Franklin's testimony, but it was not the end of the taxation issue.
many rights we violated like paying taxes stright to the british government
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What angered American colonist about the Stamp Act of 1765?
The American colonists claimed that their constitutional rights were being violated.
Why did the colonists dislike the Stamp Act of 1765?
The colonist felt that the taxes violated there rights and also the British couldn't pull taxation without representation.
What did the stamp act of congress of 1765 accomplish?
made the Declaration of Rights and grievance
What rights did the sugar act violate?
the rights that were being violated by the sugar act was that the British made the colonists trade the tea with the india company which
The stamp act created confusion between?
The Stamp Act was a tax act that was enacted by British Parliament on the American Colonists. The Stamp Act caused problems between the two because the tax was a violation of the colonists rights.
How did the stamp act angered the colonist how the reacted to it?
The colonists were required to pay for a stamp when they bought paper products, and the colonists felt that it violated their rights. So they published a series of resolutions stating that the stamp act violated their rights.
Why did the colonist felt the stamp act violated their rights?
the colonist were mad
What angered American colonist about the Stamp Act of 1765?
The American colonists claimed that their constitutional rights were being violated.
Which act of Parliament caused the colonists to argue that the British had violated the principle of taxation without representation?
the stamp act
Why did the colonists dislike the Stamp Act of 1765?
The colonist felt that the taxes violated there rights and also the British couldn't pull taxation without representation.
Which act of the parliament caused the colonists to argue that the British had violated the principle of taxation with representation?
the stamp act
What did the stamp act of congress of 1765 accomplish?
made the Declaration of Rights and grievance
What are your opinions on women's rights?
today women are violated in many ways the women rights will not act propely
Which action by Britain did the colonists believe violated the principle stated in the Declaration of Independence that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed?
passage of the stamp act.
What rights did the sugar act violate?
the rights that were being violated by the sugar act was that the British made the colonists trade the tea with the india company which
How did the Declaratory Act violate the rights of the colonial assemblies?
It violated their right to freedom
In 1765 it issued the Declaration of Rights and Grievances which claimed the rights of Englishmen especially the right not to be taxed without consent?
stamp act congress
