Periodization refers to categorizing periods of history by name. Some examples of named periods of history include the Middle Ages, Gothic, and Baroque.
i also dont know
india
financial advertising
Asian ancient mediual madernc or in simpler words you can say the Indian history is divided into 3 periods HINDU.....when the Indian rulers ruled in India MUSLIM...when the mughals came India and established the mughal empire BRITISH.....when the east India company came India as a small trading group and consolidated power over India
Periodization refers to categorizing periods of history by name. Some examples of named periods of history include the Middle Ages, Gothic, and Baroque.
James Mill divided history according to the religion or view of the most dominant and powerful ruler in India at the time. The problem with the periodization of James Mill is that he only looks at Indian history from the view point of the rulers, and doesn't think about the views of the people.
Periodisation (in relation to training) is the different parts in the training programme.
the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.
James Mill's periodization of Indian history, particularly in his work "The History of British India," reflects a Eurocentric perspective that categorizes Indian civilization into distinct stages: ancient, medieval, and modern. This framework underscores Mill's belief in the superiority of Western civilization and implies a linear progression of societal development, positioning India as stagnant or regressive. His categorization often overlooks the complexities and continuities of Indian history, reducing it to a simplistic narrative that aligns with colonial ideologies. Ultimately, Mill's periodization reveals more about British attitudes toward colonial subjects than it does about the actual historical realities of India.
James Mill's periodization of Indian history was problematic because it oversimplified and misrepresented the complexities of India's diverse cultures and historical developments. He divided Indian history into three distinct periods—Hindu, Muslim, and British—without adequately acknowledging the rich interactions and continuities between these eras. This linear and Eurocentric perspective marginalized indigenous narratives and contributions, leading to a skewed understanding of India's past. Additionally, it reinforced colonial attitudes by portraying Indian society as stagnant and in need of Western intervention for progress.
history of housing finance in india
Mediviel history modern history
Max mullar wrote the history of India
TISS is the only organization which will tell the origin and history of social work education in India.
The british were the most recent in the history of India , since history is still being made in India its impossible to say what will come last. The history of India has transcended thousands of years and will continue to do so. its billion people make history everyday !
Mediviel history modern history