The Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly. It guarantees our right to keep and bear arms. It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. It guarantees due process in a court of law, a speedy hearing, and trial by jury. It prohibits excessive bail, fines and punishment. Most important, the Bill of Rights guarantees that rights not explicitlygranted to the government, are reserved to us as individuals.
http://www.kevincraig.us/bill_of_rights.htm
The bill of rights are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. There were added because the Constitution did not contain them explicitly.
They were afraid that the majority would ride roughshod over the minority; so they decided that some rights, even though they were inalienable natural rights, needed to be explicitly guaranteed.
The first amendment prohibits discrimination of religion and the 19th amendment prohibits discrimination of sex.
It wasn't until 2004 that the federal marriage laws were amended to explicitly prohibit same-sex marriage in Australia.
Most natural rights that you can name are in the Bill of Rights. That Bill of Rights still exists today and continues to protect our rights, so it includes all the rights we have today.In fact, the Ninth Amendment specifically states that the Constitution, including the amendments, is not intended to be an exhaustive list of the rights of the people. It acknowledges that the people have many natural rights which are not explicitly mentioned and they are not lesser rights simply because they are not enumerated.
In the Bill of Rights there are provisions that prohibit ex post facto laws and bills of attainder. There are also provisions that prohibit states from impairing contracts.
The bill of rights are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. There were added because the Constitution did not contain them explicitly.
The 9th amendment states that all rights not listed in the Bill of Rights go to the states to decide.
Yes, the bill of rights clearly states that we have freedom of religion, and having an organized religion would break that. xoxoxoxo- ally
2nd admendment
The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.
The first 10 amendments to the US Constitution are known as the "Bill of Rights."They were intended to prohibit the federal government from taking away the individual rights of its citizens, and include basic freedoms that should not be abridged.* The name comes from an earlier Bill of Rights given to England by King and Queen William and Mary. King George III decided that Bill of Rights did not apply to the American Colonies.(see related question for text of the amendments)The Bill of Rights.
They were afraid that the majority would ride roughshod over the minority; so they decided that some rights, even though they were inalienable natural rights, needed to be explicitly guaranteed.
The first amendment prohibits discrimination of religion and the 19th amendment prohibits discrimination of sex.
It wasn't until 2004 that the federal marriage laws were amended to explicitly prohibit same-sex marriage in Australia.
Most natural rights that you can name are in the Bill of Rights. That Bill of Rights still exists today and continues to protect our rights, so it includes all the rights we have today.In fact, the Ninth Amendment specifically states that the Constitution, including the amendments, is not intended to be an exhaustive list of the rights of the people. It acknowledges that the people have many natural rights which are not explicitly mentioned and they are not lesser rights simply because they are not enumerated.
Not really; Madison believed that there was no need for a "Bill of Rights" that would explicitly prohibit the government from acts that the government wasn't given any authorization to do at all. So in the Second Amendment, Madison didn't believe that there was any need to safeguard the right of the average citizen to own a firearm, because the Constitution's list of explicitly LIMITED powers never authorized the government to control or regulate firearms at all. However, while he didn't see any NEED for a bill of rights, he had no OBJECTION to one, and acceded to the demand in order to get the Constitution ratified. History has shown us that Madison was wrong, and the Anti-Federalists were right, in believing that over a span of years that government would invariably grow more powerful and intrusive.