0
What else can I help you with?
What did the Kentucky Resolution had originally stated?
States could nullify laws of Congress
Who can nullify an Act of Congress?
The Supreme Court can nullify an Act of Congress. They would have to say that it specifically contridicted the Constitution. The President could affect a law by refusing to enforce it.
Jefferson and Hamilton differed on the question of whether or not Congress could do what?
They disagreed on practically everything but their esteem for George Washington. Specifically, however, their greatest and most significant difference on a power of Congress was whether Congress could establish a national bank (the "First Bank of the United States"). Hamilton argued that because Article I, section 9 of the Constitution did not specifically prohibit Congress from creating a national bank, then Congress was empowered to do so under Article I, section 8, clause 18 (the "implied powers clause," "necessary and proper clause," or "elastic clause"). Jefferson, who took a more limited view of Federal power, argued that because Article I, section 8 did not specify Congress could create a national bank, then it could not. Jefferson believed that only specified powers (such as power to tax, to maintain an army, to punish counterfeiters, etc.) could be exercised by Congress.
Under the Articles of Confederation what could congress?
Congress could not tax and it could not control or interfere with trade between the individual states.
Why should states not be able to nullify?
States should not be able to nullify federal laws because it undermines the principle of a unified legal system, which is essential for maintaining order and consistency across the nation. Allowing states to nullify federal laws could lead to a patchwork of conflicting regulations, creating confusion and hindering the effectiveness of national policies, particularly in areas like civil rights and public health. Furthermore, it risks intensifying regional divisions and could challenge the authority of the federal government, which is designed to serve the collective interests of all states.
What did the Kentucky Resolution had originally stated?
States could nullify laws of Congress
What did the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions argue?
States could nullify federal laws. That states could and should decide when Congress was passing unconstitutional laws PLATOO against a loose interpretation of the constitution
In the Webster-Hayne debate Daniel Webster argued that?
In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
Who can nullify an Act of Congress?
The Supreme Court can nullify an Act of Congress. They would have to say that it specifically contridicted the Constitution. The President could affect a law by refusing to enforce it.
What was nullification?
Nullification was the idea that the states could declare acts of congress to be unconstitutional. In particular South Carolina objected to the federal tariff while Jackson was president and decided to nullify it and so not collect it or pay it.
What arguements did Andrew Jackson give to refute South carolinas claim to nullify an act of congress?
Andrew Jackson refuted South Carolina's claim to nullify federal laws by asserting the supremacy of the federal government over state actions. He argued that the Constitution, as the supreme law of the land, did not permit states to unilaterally reject federal laws. Jackson emphasized the importance of preserving the Union and maintained that such actions could lead to anarchy and disunity among the states. He believed that the authority to interpret laws and their constitutionality rested with the federal judiciary, not individual states.
What did the doctrine of nullification maintain?
b. state government could nullify any federal law.
What senator held that states could not nullify a federal law and said that liberty and union were inseparable?
Daniel Webster
What was the The Doctrine of Nullification?
This doctrine taught that any state could nullify a law of the United States that was contrary to the Constitution as they understood it.
Jefferson and Hamilton differed on the question of whether or not Congress could do what?
They disagreed on practically everything but their esteem for George Washington. Specifically, however, their greatest and most significant difference on a power of Congress was whether Congress could establish a national bank (the "First Bank of the United States"). Hamilton argued that because Article I, section 9 of the Constitution did not specifically prohibit Congress from creating a national bank, then Congress was empowered to do so under Article I, section 8, clause 18 (the "implied powers clause," "necessary and proper clause," or "elastic clause"). Jefferson, who took a more limited view of Federal power, argued that because Article I, section 8 did not specify Congress could create a national bank, then it could not. Jefferson believed that only specified powers (such as power to tax, to maintain an army, to punish counterfeiters, etc.) could be exercised by Congress.
What could congress do under the Articles of Confederation?
Congress could not tax and it could not control or interfere with trade between the individual states.
What could congress not under the Articles of Confederation?
Congress could not tax and it could not control or interfere with trade between the individual states.
