0
What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Skylar H
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Jhele'e Nowden
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Which best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
How do historians use primary and secondary sources?
A primary source is like a diary of somebody that has experienced something or the person them self (autobiography) A secondary source is when somebody has heard the story and retells it or writes about it. (biography) A primary source is the most reliable because information can be lost or changed by a secondary source so historians favor primary sources.
Why is the parchment of rome a primaresource?
Primary sources are direct historical sources, as opposed to what had been written by modern historians, which are secondary sources. Writing on parchment became widespread in the Later Roman Empire. Hence writings of parchment are primary sources.
Why are sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
What tools do historians use?
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
Are primary sources or secondary sources more valuable to modern historians?
secondary
What are the two sources that historians use?
primary sources and secondary sources.
What tools do historians?
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
Are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Why are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
What two types of sources that historians have?
Primary sources and secondary sources. Primary sources are firsthand accounts or direct evidence of an event, while secondary sources are interpretations, analysis, or commentary on primary sources.
Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians and why?
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and the secondary sources they used to answer their questions?
to be happy
Why do historians have to evaluate primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?
to be happy
Why do historians have to evaluate the primary secondary sources they use to answer their question?
to be happy
Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and secondary sources they used to answer questions?
to be happy
