Wiki User
∙ 13y agoPlessy v. Ferguson, (1896), sanctioned legal segregation by upholding a Louisiana Law that required separate train cars for African-American and Caucasian travelers. The Court reasoned that segregation was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment as long as the facilities and accommodations were equal. The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy is the origin of the "separate but equal" doctrine that legally allowed states to pass racist Jim Crow laws for almost 60 years.
Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) specifically addressed the negative affects of segregation in public education, holding "separate but equal is inherently unequal," and also unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. Brown was an important milestone in the Civil Rights Movement.
Case Citations:
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoIn 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.
dred scott
One argument about segregation made by Thurgood Marshall before the Supreme Court was that African American students suffered damage from being treated differently.
It began in 1896 when the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy vs Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional.
Plessy v. Ferguson.
No single justice declared segregation unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954); all nine justices overturned the "separate but equal" precedent set in Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), by voting unanimously.Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the opinion of the Court in that case, a safe bet for a test answer, but don't be mislead into thinking he overturned any racial segregation laws unilaterally (all by himself).
The US Supreme Court overturned the "separate but equal" precedent established in Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), when they declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954).A precedent is a court decision used as a model for future decisions. In 1896, the Supreme Court decided racial segregation was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, as long as African-Americans were provided equal services and facilities (which rarely happened). The courts upheld the precedent established in Plessy for nearly 60 years.Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) had nothing to do with overturning a US President, but the two words (precedent and president) are often confused.
The US Supreme Court has the authority to overturn a precedent in any case under their review, if they feel the precedent no longer applies to current social and legal circumstances. They can also ignore precedents if they feel a case creates an exception to the rule, for whatever reason.
true
well at this time the answer is not founded but you can try to find it and be smart ... (:
As the highest court in the US, a ruling by the Supreme Court can not be challanged legally.In effect lower courts must make rulings on cases in line with any historic, relavent Supreme Court decisions (or their rulings will be overturned by higher courts).This means that a ruling by the Supreme Court sets the US legal standard - sets a precedent."precedent" means coming before another or others in time, place, rank, or sequence.
The Supreme Court did not play a direct role in legalizing segregation. In fact, the Court issued several significant rulings that challenged and overturned segregation laws. For example, in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Court declared "separate but equal" segregation in public schools unconstitutional. However, certain Supreme Court decisions, like Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), perpetuated the "separate but equal" doctrine and set the stage for segregation laws. It took many years and additional Supreme Court decisions to dismantle legalized segregation.
NO!
fourteenth amendment
U.S Supreme Court
The president does not have any power over the decisions of the Supreme Court. Only the Supreme Court itself can overturn a supreme court decision.
Not entirely. There have been many cases of judicial review that has been overturned. One noted example is the idea of "separate but equal", the legal argument for segregation of whites and minorities. However, it took almost a century for this to be overturned so in a single lifetime the judgment could be final.Added: The initial answer has the element of truth to it, but it is not made clear that Supreme Court decisions can only be reversed by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. Decisions of the US Supreme Court are final and binding, and cannot be overturned by any other body of Government.