The Romans did not have a middle class like us. They had three social orders (as they called them). The patricians were the aristocracy. The equites (equestrians, cavalrymen) were a class of wealthy bankers, moneylenders, merchants and investors in mining and shipping. The rest were the plebeians, which comprised both middle income groups and the masses of the poor.
There was a huge gap between the rich and the poor in ancient Rome. The rich lived a life of great luxury. There was a middling income class, which cannot be compared with the modern middle class. The majority of the population lived in abject poverty. The masses of the poor relied on a grain dole which distributed free grain to the poor.
was benjamin banneker rich or poor or middle class
he was middle class
i think he was middle class
She was brought up in relative middle/upper class
rich and poor
Canada does have a middle rich and poor class. :)
She was not rich but I don't know if she was poor or middle class but I think it's middle class
middle
Rich
poor or middle class
There is rich, middle class, and poor. I, myself, am middle class.
She was neither rich nor poor, she was in a middle-class family.
was benjamin banneker rich or poor or middle class
Middle Class.
he was middle class
His family was middle class moving to upper middle class.
both and middle class. you get people on benefits (poor) working class (middle class) and people with really good jobs are quite rich. you can work both down and up.