Well, if you consider George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Francis Marion, and a bunch of others 'important people,' there sure were. Washington, our first President, was a Virginian. Jefferson not only authored the Declaration of Independence, he was the third President & the man who acquired the Louisiana Purchase. He was also a Virginian. James Madison, another Virginian and President, authored the Bill of Rights. Monroe was President--yet another Virginian. Marion, known as The Swamp Fox, was one of the most effective field commanders in the Revolution. He was from South Carolina. The list could fill a fair-sized book.
The New England colonies had several important seaports, of which the most important was Boston.
On the whole, the New England and Middle Colonies of America in the 17th and 18th centuries did not contain widespread nor economically significant slave-holding. That slavery was initially legal is undeniable; however, by contrast with the Southern colonies, the basic way of life of these colonies was not dependent on slave-labor in any important respect.
For the average child in the southern colonies, almost no formal education was forthcoming. There were few schools and most would not allow any poor children to attend.
does any body know the answer of this question: § "How was geographic location important to economic, social, and political development of ancient Rome?"
by raising taxes in the American colonies without granting the colonies any representation in Parliament
marbles, hop scocht , and i don't know any more
they did not wear any
no
They were self-government , they had meetings on issues if their was any.
As early as 1634 New England had public schools, but the southern states depended on tutoring for the plantation children. Poor people and slaves didn't get any education.
The New England colonies had several important seaports, of which the most important was Boston.
On the whole, the New England and Middle Colonies of America in the 17th and 18th centuries did not contain widespread nor economically significant slave-holding. That slavery was initially legal is undeniable; however, by contrast with the Southern colonies, the basic way of life of these colonies was not dependent on slave-labor in any important respect.
For the average child in the southern colonies, almost no formal education was forthcoming. There were few schools and most would not allow any poor children to attend.
The rich familys daughter did not have to do any chores
does any body know the answer of this question: § "How was geographic location important to economic, social, and political development of ancient Rome?"
In the 18th Century there were more farmers than any other job.
That slaves were just property and could be used or treated any way the owner wanted.