No, the the French had a 4 to 1 advantage in manpower. The Spanish had the advantage of the high ground, they had dug a trench line and every third infantry man was armed with an arquebus. Gunfire had made the difference. The French had a two to one advantage in artillery, massed musket fire was the only Spanish advantage and Spain suffered only 100 casualties compared to the 4,000 dead or wounded among the French and the Swiss. It was a small arms victory and the nature of warfare was changed forever.
Louis d'Armagnac, Duke of Nemours during the 1503 Battle of Cerignola.
yes
England won the war, suprisingly, they were outnumbered.
There were two battles of Saratoga, which one do you mean? In the final battle, the Americans won because the British surrendered because they were outnumbered.
i think they won because they had high morale (often went into battle singing) the royalists were outnumbered and they had the element of surprise
Battle of Cerignola happened on 1503-04-28.
The French had a two to one advantage when the lost the Battle of Puebla.
In Southern Italy during 1503.
Gonzalo Fernandes de Cordoba of Spain.
cerignola
It is cited as the first battle won by gunpowder small arms.
There were over 1,000 among the Spanish force of 8,000.
Cerignola olives are from the town of Cerignola in Italy.
Louis d'Armagnac, Duke of Nemours during the 1503 Battle of Cerignola.
They were outnumbered
The British were outnumbered; 15,000 to 6,000 The British were outnumbered; 15,000 to 6,000
The french provided soldiers so the Continental army outnumbered the British. The French's ships also blocked the ports so the British couldn't escape, receive food or help from Britian, or send word to Britain.