answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It's up to personal opinion.

Yes if you believe that ending the war then and there was a wise decision. The atomic bombs meant allied troops didn't need to invade mainland Japan and engage in a possibly prolonged struggle on the ground.

No if you believe that the radiation and deaths were worth ending the war.

You can do some rational calculations: take the number of lives lost to the atomic bombs, and then stack that up against the possible lives lost on a ground campaign. But you also have to take into account radiation, and the cities demolished.

flip a coin.

One of the points you need to consider is that Japan in fact had it's own atomic bomb project and Allied intelligence from several sources indicated by 1945 that Japan was close to developing it's own nuclear weapons.

These sources include a Japanese serviceman captured in the Philippines cited in a USN Intelligence report dated June 15,1945 and a British Intelligence report of march 1944 citing interrogation of the Chief Engineer from Vermork heavy water plant who had intimate knowledge of Japan's equivalent plant at Konan in Korea. Added to this were several frank exchanges in MAGIC decrypts between General Kawashima and the Japanese embassy in Berlin during 1943.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

A justification can be made that it saved both Japanese and Allied lives by ending the war without a Naval Invasion.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

According to President Truman and most of the civilians at the time, it was.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The purpose was to end the war and collapse Japan's means to make war ever again. Most people thinks it was justified.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was the second bombing on Nagasaki justified?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be justified?

Most people think so.


Was the bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?

We didn't care since Japan spilled blood first.


Where and when did the second atomic bombing take place?

The second bombing took place on the city of Nagasaki (Japan), on the 9th of August, 1945.


How did the US decide to drop a second bomb on Nagasaki?

Japan refused to surrender after the bombing of Hiroshima.


Allied bombing of nagasaki?

The allies did not participate in the bombing of Nagasaki. President Truman took all the responsible.


How many people died in the second nuclear bombing?

90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000-80,000 in Nagasaki.


Who surrendered after the bombing of Nagasaki?

Japan


Who won the bombing of nagasaki?

The U.S.A won the war after dropping the bomb on Nagasaki.


When was the Nagasaki bombing?

It was August 8th, 1945


Japanese Population before the atomic bombing?

See: Atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki


When did America ended the bombing on hiroshima and nagasaki?

August 6 1945 was Hiroshima and the 9th was Nagasaki.


How was the condition right after the bombing at nagasaki?

Nagasaki was devastated. The damage reached over 12 miles.