0
That is has never been resolved.
Largely those that say it is do so on account of the already ongoing genocide that the Japanese were committing on other nations and that the Japanese refused surrender despite warnings and then again after the first bomb dropped.
Those that say it isn't do so on account of the number of civilian deaths, general immorality and that it was excessive in its nature.
Personally, I would consider the first legal as per "jus in bello" and the second a war crime as the impact of the first probably hadn't been fully comprehended at the time the second was dropped.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Vivi
Professor
LaoAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is japan's law-making body?
The Diet
What country started the Six Day War of 1967?
Israel launched the first attack of bombing Egypt's Airforce, but Egypt provided a prior causus belli by blocking the Straits of Tiran (an illegal act according to international law).
In wartime what was the international law of the seas?
ships of neutral nations were not to be harmed
Law passed in reaction to the secret cambodia bombing that restricted presidential use of troops overseas without congressional authorization?
the war powers act
Was there segregation in Hawaii before the bombing of Pearl Harbor?
The US Military was segregated until Truman signed a new law in 1947. Two years after WW2 ended.
