Yes, Saladin was a good military leader, when fighting against the Crusaders, he besieged and captured Palestine from the Kingdom of Jerusalem, after his success at the Battle of Hattin also known as the Horns of Hattin - where he had strategically battled against the Crusaders and as a result of their victory the Muslims became the most eminent military power in the Holy Land, reconquering Jerusalem.
He was also chivalrous as noted even by the Christian chroniclers. Despite him being their nemesis in terms of battle, he won the majority of their respects, including that of Richard the Lionheart, Saladin was a key example of the principles of chivalry.
It depends on which side of the Crusades you were on, but Saladin and Richard the Lionheart negotiated, eventually reaching an agreement which respected both Islam and Christianity. Unfortunately, it did not last.
Saladin was an excellent leader, and he had an excellent understanding of military matters. He was also willing to negotiate with the enemy.
saladin
Saladin
it is saladin the ruler of egypt.
Saladin
Saladin was an excellent leader, and he had an excellent understanding of military matters. He was also willing to negotiate with the enemy.
Saladin led the Muslims in some of the Crusades.
Saladin?
There was not a unified leader of the Muslims. The Muslim peoples were split into a number of different groups, and not one collective body. Leaders that were important in the First Crusade from the Muslim side would probably be Kilij Arslan and Danishmend.
saladin
saladin
Saladin .
Richard the lionhearted was the leader of the catholic Army during the third crusade and Saladin was his opponent. Saladin was the leader of the Islamic side of the third crusade.
You can believe he was, putting up such a harsh fight with the Christians. Plus, to lead his own nation in such a huge series of wars, he had to be a good leader, but you decide for yourselves.
The leader Salah Eddin
Saladin
it is saladin the ruler of egypt.