Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803) involved a political battle between the Federalist Party (former President John Adams) and the Democratic-Republic Party (formerly called the Anti-Federalists, founded by new President Thomas Jefferson) for control of the Judicial branch of government. Historians speculate the lawsuit was intended as a weapon to embarrass Jefferson.
John Marshall defused the political tension by giving the new Jefferson administration a narrow ruling on Marbury that satisfied the Democratic-Republicans, but simultaneously enhanced the power of the judiciary by clearly explicating the Court's right of judicial review, by declaring Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional (a legal maneuver to overcome a political problem).
President Jefferson was not pleased with that aspect of the ruling and predicted the Supreme Court would become an "oligarchy," but had no grounds to challenge Marshall because the decision was in his party's, and his administration's, favor.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Chat with our AI personalities
The power to declare a law unconstitutional (Judicial Review).
In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court established the power of judicial review, allowing the Court to declare laws unconstitutional. This case affirmed the Court's role in interpreting the Constitution and balancing the powers of the branches of government, shaping American constitutional law.
There is no case called Marbury v. Maryland. There are however, famous cases called 1) Marbury v. Madison, which was the first exercise of judicial review when it deemed a law unconstitutional. and 2) McCollugh v. Maryland, which established that the Constitution gives Congress implied powers.
In Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional. This decision significantly strengthened the role of the judiciary in interpreting the Constitution and shaping American law.
In the famous Marbury vs. Madison case in 1803, the US Supreme Court ruled that it had the power of judicial review. This entailed that the Court has the power to determine if a bill passed by Congress and signed into law by the President is in accordance with the US Constitution. By its own power the Court could either declare a law valid and thus "Constitutional" or if invalid, to be reversed.