Caesar was turning the Republic which had been a primarily aristocratic run system, into a more accessable system for plebs. Basically saying that only the rich should not be ruling Rome. He expanded the senate allowing lower class individuals to run for seats as well as Gauls (a new province of Rome). So in the name of the plebs, Caesar shouldn't have been killed.
Caesar was able to expand the Empire by conquering Gaul (modern day France). Once conquered, it was called Caesaria (Land of Caesar). He tried for Britain but failed. For the expansionistic desires of Rome, Caesar should not have been killed.
Chat with our AI personalities
Yes, Caesar was warned about the murder. He was previously warned by the soothsayer who hinted at the ides of march of being a dangerous day for Caesar and later the warning came in form of calphurnia's dreams whereby she urged and insisted Caesar citing scenes why he should not go out. Then, while going to the senate, Caesar lost his last chance to save his life when he ignored Artemidorus's request to read his petition which was a letter conveying the names of the conspirators.
If Julius Caesar wasn't Assassinated then Rome would be stronger and survive more conquering new territories and discovering new places I say that Rome would stay as a republic with a consul for life and even dominate Europe and Asia in the future.
Possibly. If Caesar had read the letter that Artemidorous tried to give him listing the conspirators and their assassination plot.
No, he had to be at the arena at the time. But his guards could've searched for knife before Brutus and others could have killed him. After he entered though his fate was sealed.
Yes, with other conspirators: Julius CAESAR
Julius Caesar Murder*
34
No one killed Julius Caesar - he was immortal.
why is Julius Caesar a political ? why is Julius Caesar a political ? why is Julius Caesar a political ? why is Julius Caesar a political ? why is Julius Caesar a political ?