Anglo settlers were colonist in Mexico and Mexican settlers weren't
The second Anglo-Powhatan war took place in 1644. The result of the war was a boundary created between the Natives and the Settlers.
None. It was a clash between Mexican forces and Anglo-speaking settlers.
By law that had to be Catholics.
Fight for the land. Native Americas were already being encroached and sacked of their lands at the end of the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). When these territories were acquired from Mexico, also Mexicans became victims of this "ethnic cleansing" movement.
Anglo settlers were colonist in Mexico and Mexican settlers weren't
They continued with their slavery practices. See related questions.
That Anglo settlers would try to revolt and secede from Mexico.
It was a siege, where Anglo-American settlers entrenched themselves within the El Alamo chapel. Mexican troops laid siege and ultimately defeated such settlers.
The second Anglo-Powhatan war took place in 1644. The result of the war was a boundary created between the Natives and the Settlers.
None. It was a clash between Mexican forces and Anglo-speaking settlers.
As much as current Mexican-Americans have the right to split and conform the independent republic of Mexifornia (e.g. a resounding NO).
La Salle.
The major theme of the Mier y Teran report was the concern over the growing influence of Anglo-American settlers in Texas and the potential threat to Mexico's control over the region. The report emphasized the need for Mexico to strengthen its presence in Texas to prevent the loss of territory to these settlers.
What was the Anglo population of Texas in 1830?
Mexico the country, no. New Mexico, the state, yes.
They relaxed their immigration policies and allowed American immigrants to populate these northern territories under the empresario system.