I believe that this case is against the constitution and is racist and should not be allowed. For one reason say we were to go to war with England i bet that they wouldn't throw every white person in a camp.
The ancient Roman forum was a marketplace. The people went there basically to do their shopping, and to transact various business. The fora were also good places to catch up on the latest gossip. In the Forum Romanum, the main political forum, there was a notice posted to tell the people of the day's dealings in the Senate.
Most likely the same way the Egyptians did, building a ramp. In this case they must have built up a bridging of temporary stones between the supporting columns so they are of same level, then by building ramps on both sides to buttress the whole unit, so it is strong enough to support the overhead stone being pulled up one of the ramps, when they were done and the stone was in place, they simply removed the ramps along with the temporary bridging of stones between the columns.
I would say apartheids, as in "the apartheids of South Africa and India." In this case, if the word "apartheid" was used, it would sound (to me, at least) like South Africa and India had gotten together and created a joint apartheid program.
The word Arapaho may already be plural, but there is no general agreement on the correct way to write the singular and plural forms.Its origin is obscure; some people claim it comes from the Pawnee term tirapihu (= he trades, compare Arikara raapih = to buy), others that it is from the Crow words aaraxpéahush (= tatoos-many people) or from a similar Hidatsa word.In either case it is clearly not the tribe's own name for themselves, which is hinóno'éí. The meaning of this word is also not clear, although it looks similar to the word for man or person. It is identical in the singular and plural form.Some modern writers use the form Arapahoe and Arapahoes, or Arapaho and Arapahos; if the real meaning of Arapaho is "many tattoos people" then putting an s on the end seems unnecessary.
No, in the form "stones throw", the noun "stones" is the plural form of the noun "stone".A possessive noun is indicated by an apostrophe s ('s) or just an apostrophe (') added to the end of a plural noun that already ends with an s.The correct plural possessive form is: stones'throwThe singular possessive form is: a stone'sthrow
The correct example of the plural possessive case would be "men's plans." This indicates that the plans belong to more than one man.
The correct example of the plural possessive case is D) women's plans.
NONE are correct examples of plural possessive nouns.The correct plural possessive noun is:b. men's plansThe remaining phrases are singular forms:a. stone's throwc. its place (singular possessive adjective; pronouns do not use an apostrophe to show possession)d. woman's plans
The possessive case of the plural noun "countries" is "countries'."
the answer is c.
The correct plural possessive form is:B. the men's plans (the plans of a number of men)The correct singular possessive forms are:A. a stone's throw (the distance of a throw of a stone)D. the woman's plans (the plans of a woman)The incorrect possessive form is:C. it's place: the possessive form of the pronoun it is its (no apostrophe).The form it's (with apostrophe) is a contraction, a shortened form of "it is".
In English, a noun or pronoun is described by its number and case. "My" is singular in number and possessive in case. "Our" is plural in number and possessive in case. Plural simply means more than one.
The possessive form of the plural noun hours is hours'.
The plural possessive form is mothers-in-law's.
No, the word "mens" is an incorrect form.The plural noun is "men". The plural possessive form is men's.
Your is the possessive form for a singular or plural noun and a subject or object noun.