0
For those that do not know hrh ricky nathaniel, he is known as the armadeggon judge, the sovereign owner and prince of the peace palace international court of justice the hague Netherlands
hrh ricky nathaniel, nato otan lord god lord windsor
krushuna 9gv pravostha interstellar prashuna pravas
the international court of justice (icj), the hague
sovereign supreme justice, divine judge, head prosecutor
krushuna sovereign royal imperial judge 445 am0115432
krushuna pravostha armed forces executor ak788, ak778, ak13579, axis god scbustecbwbgbsp001
krushuna sovereign paramilitary courts committee of 300 treasury auditing organizations, chairman c3 am01
the supreme court of India, sovereign supreme justice
the united nations system, sovereign chairman
yes,
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What can the UN Security Council do to stop conflict?
The UN Security Council has the mandate of ensuring international peace and security.They have several tools to do this. The SC can:-Authorize military actionAuthorize economic sanctionsRefer a dispute to the ICJ
Who is the owner of Ambalat Island?
In theory, Malaysia owns Ambalat (which is subject to a territorial dispute between Indonesia) with the publication of a map by Malaysia in 1979. The map shows that the area within its Malaysia territorial waters and continental shelf but Indonesia has profusely objected to the map. Ambalat is the sea block of the Celebes Sea beween Indonesian province of East Kalimantan and south-east of the Malaysian state of Sabah. This whole region is formerly known as Borneo. Located at the heart of the Indo-Pacific basin Ambalat is near the centre of one of the richest marine habitats in the world called Sipadan. More than 3,000 species of fish and hundreds of coral species have been classified in this ecosystem. The absence of territorial sea boundary between Indonesia and Malaysia, consequently, leaves an uncertainty regarding the sovereignty over the territorial sea (water column). Meaning Indonesia still can claim Ambalat due to the fact Malaysia has agreed a seabed boundary but have not yet agreed a boundary for the water column. Gosong Niger is part of the seabed that is divided by the boundary line where two third of the seabed fall within the Indonesian side. With regard to this, the ownership of the sandbar is considerably clear. As there is a precise line, it should have been clear who own which seabed. However, Indonesia has never officially announced the exact locations of its maritime territorial limits. Consequently, the Malaysian navy had chased Indonesian fishermen out of Ambalat while Indonesia further accused Malaysia of 35 violations of disputed territory. This case is by no mean similar 2002's Sipadan-Ligitan Island where 16 out 17 judges from International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarded Sipadan-Ligitan from Indonesia to Malaysia on a basis of effective occupation. Malaysia has been actively established a permanent tourism service around the area and provide facilities for diving, swimming, and other aqua-tourism activities around Ambalat. In that case, the 'effective occupation' (Effectivités) is a relevant consideration to decide the sovereignty over it. Sipadan- Ligitan a new Malaysia's territory and archipelagic basepoints and this could theoretically put Indonesia in a worse position to claim Ambalat. Malaysia will not refer the dispute with Indonesia over Ambalat to the International Court of Justice in the Hague, Defence Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said in June 2009. Instead, he said the matter should be resolved through the existing brotherly diplomatic channels.
Who owns sabah?
The territory of Sabah belongs to the people of Sabah who in 1963 legally formed Malaysia federation as a act of self determination. In 1865 Charles Lees Moses obtained from the Sultan of Borneo a lease on Sabah (north Borneo) for 10 years he then sold the lease to Joseph William Torrey as the lease came to an end he sold his remaining rights to the Consul of the Austro Hungarian empire Baron Von Overbeck who in 1875 obtained a renewal. In 1878 he became Maharajah of Sabah and Raja of Gaya and Sandakan making him the legal overlord of the territory 3 weeks later he aquired the lesser title from Sultan of Sulu whose power was in question and who was colonized only a few months later by the Spanish. In 1885 the Spanish agreed to recognise the territory of North Borneo as British in the Madrid protocols the Sulu Sultans cannot make any claims as they were no longer in power over their own territories. In 1903 in a confirmatory deed Sulu sultan Jamulural Kiram II confirmed the cession of Sabah and furter Islands to the British North Borneo company in return for a further 300 Pesos (Mexican) his loss of power and lands meant he was in no position to control anything and he was simply securing a pension for himself and his heirs. In 1938 his heirs arrived in the Borneo high court to argue for resumption of cession fees as it had been stopped (due to Kiram having so many heirs no one knwe who was the legal heir and who was not he himself appointed 9 heirs which was unrealistic) the judge agreed and confirmed the land was ceded. In 1942 Japan conquered North Borneo and dissolved ANY previous agreements therefore the previous treaties spoken herein are invalid including the 1878 treaty Sulu reguluraly thumps in the air ignoring all other agreements prior to this one and after it. Please note Sabah according to the Brunei side sabah was never given to Sulu which is why the Brunei sultan appointed Von Overbeck over lord of Sabah Sulu's ONLY claim is through the tributes they frightened the people into paying to them (they were pirates and raiders similar to the Vikings of Europe) there is NO CESSION treaty between Sulu and Borneo (Brunei). Also note in the Suluk and British versions of the agreement in 1878 Sabah was and has been leased/ceded in perpeuity meaning forever UNTIL the sun and moon no longer rise since they are still rising Sulu has no claim. Laws of decolonisation of the United Nations and the laws of effective control are both in Malaysias side also note to any Filipino who might see this International court of Justice is not AN option as would Philippines go to ICJ over Mindanao? Also the people of Sabah freely chose to join Malaysia if their vote was disregarded and their contribution to Malaysia (which is great) the people would choose to leave Malaysia and neither Philippines/sulu or Malaysia will get it. there are no other points that can challenge this as 1878 agreement is null and void by modern thinking.
What is the name of judge in india who refer to internation court of justice?
Dalveer Bhandari selected as chief justice of ICJ
What does ICJ do?
Almost 50 years ago, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) pioneered the practice of sending experts to observe trials where there were concerns about the integrity of the proceedings
What does the acronyms ICJ means?
international court of justice
Where was the ICJ formed?
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) was formed by the UN Charter, signed in San Francisco, United States, on 26 June 1945.The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands.
Does the International Court of Justice ensure countries compliance with the law?
The fact of the matter is that the ICJ cannot actually ensure state compliance. The ICJ simply determines whether or not any violation of a treaty between two or more nation states has been violated. The ICJ does not have any means of enforcing the law. In fact, international law is enforced primarily by the Security Council.
World Court judges?
Judges who work at the World Court (aka ICJ).
Does ICJ exercise jurisdiction over the claim of a de facto government?
Yes!
What is the acronym for International Court Of Justice?
The acronym for International Court Of Justice is ICJ.
How does the International Court of Justice reach decisions?
The ICJ reaches an unanimous decision, although it is possible for a judge to deliver a separate opinion. The procedure of reaching decisions consists of two parts: written and oral, according to Article 43.1 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.
Where does the international court of justice get its funding from?
The International Court of Justice(ICJ) is funded by the United Nations.
Can the public attend ICC or ICJ trials?
Trials and hearing conducted by the courts or other governmental agencies are always open to the public unless the judge or hearing officer declares them "closed" for some exceptional reason (i.e.- juvenile testifying - classified information being testified to - etc).
Can Obama be tried at the world court?
There is no such thing as a 'world court'. There are, however, the ICJ and the ICC. Other than that the US doesn't recognize the ICC and the ICJ is meant for states only, you should keep in mind that Barack Obama has absolute immunity, just like other world leaders.
