Had he given in to Cassius's much more realpolitik suggestions, they would have bumped off Antony at the same time as Caesar and have consolidated their positions in Rome. But if Brutus had been that kind of a guy, Cassius would not have recruited him as an ally in the first place.
If idealism is a "tragic flaw" in Brutus, then isn't it also a "tragic flaw" in Jesus? If he had only co-operated with the Sanhedrin and the Romans he wouldn't have been crucified, right? But I think Jesus would have said that his ideals were more important than not getting killed, and I think Brutus (at least in the way Shakespeare portrayed him) would have said the same.
Curiously, Dante portrays Brutus as a villain because he betrayed his friend and benefactor. Would treachery make more sense as a tragic flaw?
Brutus embodies the archetype of the tragic hero in Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar." He is a noble and honorable character whose internal conflict and moral dilemmas lead to his downfall. Driven by his ideals of justice and the greater good, his decision to betray Caesar ultimately results in catastrophic consequences, showcasing the tragic flaws of idealism and naivety. Brutus's journey reflects the complexity of human motives and the tragic impact of misguided loyalty.
tragic flaw
In Act 4 of "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," the interaction between Brutus and his servants Varrus and Claudio reveals Brutus's internal conflict and sense of isolation following Caesar's assassination. Their conversation highlights Brutus's commitment to his principles, as he struggles with the moral implications of their actions and the consequences of the civil unrest. This dynamic also underscores the tension between Brutus’s idealism and the chaotic political environment, propelling the plot toward the impending conflict with Antony and Octavius. Ultimately, the servants' loyalty contrasts with Brutus’s isolation, emphasizing the tragic dimensions of his character.
Realizing that his friend Brutus has been part of the conspiracy to kill him.
they both have a tragic hero with a tragic flaw in JC: Brutus; whos tragic flaw is his naivity In TFA: Okonkwo; who tragic flaw is being like his father (being feminine)
idealism- he trusts too much
1) Idealism 2) Perfectionism 3) maybe naivety 4) poor judgment 5) his honour 6) thrust 7) gullibility
Tragic Hero
They both commited suicide due to realizing that they were losing the battle against Antony and Octavius at Phillipi. They are different because Cassius didn't neede to beg anyone to kill him his slave Pindarus had no trouble killing Cassius because it meant he was free from his rule and Cassius wouldn't be missed by most where as Brutus had to beg his soldiers to kill him because Brutus was an honorable man and prior to the speech of Antony at Caesar's funeral, was beloved by by the Romans.eventually the slave named Clitus allowed Brutus to run upon his sword.
tragic flaw
Hamartia is a tragic flaw or error in judgment that leads a character to their downfall in a tragedy. It is a key element in tragic storytelling as it underscores the fatal flaw or mistake that ultimately brings about the protagonist's downfall.
a tragic hero needs to be of high birth, he needs to have a tragic flaw which might be pride, arrogance or simply lack of insight which brings about his downfall.
Excessive pride that usually leads to a tragic downfall.
A fatal flaw leading to the downfall of a tragic hero or heroine.
It is a trait in a hero that will ultimately lead to their tragic downfall.
In Greek tragedy, "hamartia" refers to a fatal flaw in a character that leads to their downfall. It is often translated as "tragic flaw" and represents a mistake or error in judgment that ultimately causes the tragic hero's downfall.
Yes he is a tragic hero. His pride is his major flaw. A tragic hero is the main character in a tragedy who makes an error in his or her actions that leads to his or her downfall. This is what Willy is...