It helped a little, but they were still poor. Fascist economies are typically bad.
In most European countries there was so much destruction as a result of World War 2 that it's not possible to separate this out from other factors that damaged many European economies.
I believe that regional areas are not affected by history. Actually i think is the opposite. I think that regional areas affect history but how is a different question.
the industrialization of England and the development of transportation
Countries economies became more interconnected following World War I APEX
It helped a little, but they were still poor. Fascist economies are typically bad.
atomic bombs
The cities were chosen as representatives of the regional economies of the U.S. in 1913. It was thought at the time that the regional economies had diverse characteristics in the type and level of economic activity, thus needed diversified accommodation.
In most European countries there was so much destruction as a result of World War 2 that it's not possible to separate this out from other factors that damaged many European economies.
Answer this question…Governments were forced to pay for food and shelter for poor refugees in their countries.
Governments were forced to pay for food and shelter for poor refugees in their countries
I believe that regional areas are not affected by history. Actually i think is the opposite. I think that regional areas affect history but how is a different question.
Did the colonies of the New World affect the economies of Southwest Asia
hi how are you i am a World War 2 veteran because of this the countries had to feed us troops which in america made us low on wheat and suger to sell
it will affect tourism and ocean shores
Unemployment rates doubled.
it affects by the climate