The Lower class Viewed Julius Caesar as a hero because he made it easier on them, by lowering the taxes and their slavery work
In general Caesar's troops respected and were loyal followers. This is because Caesar would many times personally lead them in battle, especially if the lines were faltering. His personal courage inspired them. He would also walk along with his troops rather than ride his horse or sit in a carriage. Caesar was also unique, in that he always had centurions present at his planning meetings. As the centurions were the actual battle leaders, he liked to get their opinions on his plans. Generally speaking a general leading Roman legions to successful war campaigns were popular with the army and the citizens of Rome. Caesar was assigned to go to Spain. He led brilliantly fought battles against Spanish tribes who fought hard to keep their independence from Rome. Caesar brought back to Rome enough spoils of war to enrich the Treasury of Rome and as could be expected in those days, his legions shared in the booty from the military campaigns. The Senate was so pleased that they voted him a triumph.
The Roman armies were aware of the administrative accomplishments of Caesar in Rome. His proposal as example to distribute land to 20,000 poor Roman citizens was to the legions a sign of good policy. What ever the strength of the legions, knowing that their general was a generous leader helped them to see Caesar in a good light. In 56 BC Cicero convinced the Senate to reward Caesar's armies in Gaul a substantial amount of wealth. Once again, if the legions were enriched because they were loyal troops to Caesar, this Senate award only increased the army's loyalty to Caesar. Caesar's successful campaigns in Gaul drew vast resources to Rome and more spoils of war to Caesar's legions.
However this is not to say that he had no trouble. He had a couple of mutinies to put down, but overall, the army viewed him as a leader who would bring them victory and the spoils that went along with the victories.
The senate viewed Caesar differently at different times. When he was in Gaul, they hated him and wanted him back in Rome to stand trial for irregularities when he was counsul. However, when he won the civil war, they did an about face and couldn't do enough for him. They loaded him with honors and even made him dictator for life.
Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.
Julius Caesar was man and therefore not God. However this view is only from our perspective, some 2000 years after Caesar's death. In his own time Julius Caesar was considered a god with temples and shrines dedicated to him. So in his own time he was a god, but in our time he was a man.
The main reason is that Brutus believed he was ambitious. Antony does through in some good points how he wasn't ambitious. Caesar was apparently [from Brutus's point of view] power hungry and would make Rome corrupt.
Flavius is critical because the workers are taking the day off to celebrate Caesar's victory. Flavius doesn't believe this is anything to celebrate because he doesn't think this is a real victory.
thought he was arrogant
Under the statue of Pompey; people of Valley View.
Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.
Julius Caesar was man and therefore not God. However this view is only from our perspective, some 2000 years after Caesar's death. In his own time Julius Caesar was considered a god with temples and shrines dedicated to him. So in his own time he was a god, but in our time he was a man.
Julius Caesar did not see Marc Antony as a threat. Marc Antony was the cousin of Caesar's mother. The two men were friends. Marc Antony was a senior military officer in Caesar's Gallic Wars. He was also a key supporter of Caesar's political reforms. He was loyal to Caesar.
The main reason is that Brutus believed he was ambitious. Antony does through in some good points how he wasn't ambitious. Caesar was apparently [from Brutus's point of view] power hungry and would make Rome corrupt.
If you are referring to Julius Caesar, there was no Roman expansion during his five years of rule. Rome, instead, was caught up in civil war during most o those five years. Julius Caesar conquered Gaul before he became the ruler. The people who had a negative view of this were his political opponents. They thought that Caesar did this to gain political prestige through the glamour of victory and to pay off his enormous debts through the spoils of war.
Flavius is critical because the workers are taking the day off to celebrate Caesar's victory. Flavius doesn't believe this is anything to celebrate because he doesn't think this is a real victory.
Caesar's critics thought that he fought the Gallic Wars to boost his political prestige and career and to pay off his massive debts with the spoils of war. Most historians agree with this view.
As this question is not addressed to the community as are most of them, I am placed in a situation to give my own view with the total understanding that there may be no solid answer to it because we don't know what would have happened one way or another if Caesar had not been assassinated. It's unfortunate that political assassination became a common practice before and after the Roman Republic. In my view the assassination of Julius Caesar, at that time, was of no benefit to Rome.It's worthy of note that Julius Caesar and his assassination is one of the most widely known stories in the history of Western Civilization. In comparison, the means of death of Crassis or even Pompey are not a common topic of casual conversation regarding ancient Rome. Clearly this is a result of the many historians, playwrights, and media have volumes to say about this historical figure. Perhaps Napoleon is the closest rival in history to Julius Caesar. The assassination of Caesar is monumental in the history of ancient Rome. Despite his flaws, his ability as a statesman and able military leader, leaves other figures of Rome behind, with the acception of perhaps Octavian.Caesar's death had an immediate negative affect The immediate affect was of course a 15 year civil war. Also not uncommon were civil wars but this one had the most far reaching affect.Julius Caesar, whether a consul, dictator for life ( as the Senate gave him ) or yes even a constitutional king had put forth a series of new Roman polices to reform a decedent Rome and give relief to common people and even the common soldier. Ironically many of these reforms were put in place by Octavian ( Augustus Caesar ). As per my statement at the beginning of this answer, I believe that the assassination of Julius Caesar was not in the best interests of ancient Rome.
In "Julius Caesar", Anthony's servant falls to his knees and tells Brutus that although Anthony loved Caesar, he will now vow to serve him if his past allegiance can be forgiven. He also wants to understand why Caesar was killed and to view the body.
thought he was arrogant
It depends which point of view you look at. The Patricians or the wealthy citizens of Rome did not like Caesar and thought that he was an evil, foolish tryant. The Plebians or the poorer class of citizens sort of like him. Julius Caesar wanted support of the Plebians because they were a much bigger population of people than the Patricians were. The Patricians did not Caesar to rule ROme and his family after him. Julius Caesar did perform good acts but was very ambitous or arrogant. He was blinded by power.