0
The English or British as they and the Empire of Great Britain was known, taking land from natives was justified as the natives weren't civilised didn't utilise their resources and actually had better lives under British rule than under others.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Manifest Destiny pushed westward expansion by?
the settlers pushing the natives out of their land and taking the natives land. passing laws designed to make settlement easier.
What kind of problems did Giovanni de Verrazano encounter?
Giovanni de Verranzano found it hard to trade with Maine's natives because they treated the English with great caution because men were constantly marching inland and taking land.
How did the conquistadors plan to serve god and king?
The conquistadors could serve both God and king by stealing gold and silver from the natives, subjugating them, taking their land, destroying their temples, converting the natives to Christianity, the religion of peace and goodwill, and slaughtering those who tried to stop them.
Why did European settlers call the native population of North America savages when they were the ones coming in and slaughtering the natives and taking their land?
Your question requires volumes by scholars to answer but I will provide some brief points.The Europeans considered dark-skinned people to be less than human. Therefore they felt that since those people didn't live according to the customs of the white Europeans they weren't protected from exploitation.In "New England" the English used a self serving philosophy to take the land from the native inhabitants. They decided that if the land was not enclosed (fences), and there were not inhabitations (villages and towns) and there were no tame cattle herds then the land was free for the taking. There were indeed settlements but not what the English viewed as proper towns. It was decreed the land belonged to King James I. He granted Royal Charters of vast tracts of land to English companies that came to exploit the land. Also, the native population was at an all time low because of deadly illnesses over the prior few decades in early America.At first the native inhabitants welcomed the newcomers. The English companies had received royal grants of the land and they brought token payments of trinkets and supplies for the native population. The natives had no concept of privately owned land so didn't understand that the English were taking possession of the land as their private property by "purchasing" it with those trinkets.Soon the troubles began when a few insightful native leaders realized what was happening. They were being starved and driven from their ancestral land. They became hunted and they retaliated. Slaughters from both sides ensued. However, not all natives waged war. Some continued to try to co-exist with the English. As English settlements multiplied and expanded inward those new English settlers wanted the natives removed altogether so they could settle ALL the land. The English decided the native population needed to be wiped out. The rest is history.Many Americans have forgotten how that history began and view the "native savages" as the instigators and perpetrators. They have convinced themselves that America was purchased fairly from the native inhabitants.
The english justified taking land from the native inhabitants on the grounds that the indians?
Yes.
Manifest Destiny pushed westward expansion by?
the settlers pushing the natives out of their land and taking the natives land. passing laws designed to make settlement easier.
What hardships did the English face when they first came to Canada?
The English were treated by suspicion by the natives of Canada when they first came to Canada. They were not readily accepted by the natives and did not have land for their own.
How did the french settlements in the Americas differ from the English settlements?
Most of the French settlements were men who were traders and accepted the natives. But the English settlements focused on families developing the land and basically wanted to enslave the natives.
How did the French settlements in the Americas different from the English settlements?
Most of the French settlements were men who were traders and accepted the natives. But the English settlements focused on families developing the land and basically wanted to enslave the natives.
What problems did Giovanni verrazano encounter?
Giovanni de Verranzano found it hard to trade with Maine's natives because they treated the English with great caution because men were constantly marching inland and taking land.
What could the Spanish have done instead of enslaving Africans and taking land from the Natives?
They could have exported a number of civilian workers.
Would the west coast natives be considered nomadic?
The Native American's of the west coast were considered sedentary. When the settlers began taking over their land, the natives moved and became somewhat nomadic.
What kind of problems did Giovanni de Verrazano encounter?
Giovanni de Verranzano found it hard to trade with Maine's natives because they treated the English with great caution because men were constantly marching inland and taking land.
What do the natives of new zealand call there land?
natives of new zealand are maoris....they call there land Aotearoa
How did the conquistadors plan to serve god and king?
The conquistadors could serve both God and king by stealing gold and silver from the natives, subjugating them, taking their land, destroying their temples, converting the natives to Christianity, the religion of peace and goodwill, and slaughtering those who tried to stop them.
What area were the Hebrew people natives of?
They were (and still are) natives of the land of Israel.
Why did European settlers call the native population of North America savages when they were the ones coming in and slaughtering the natives and taking their land?
Your question requires volumes by scholars to answer but I will provide some brief points.The Europeans considered dark-skinned people to be less than human. Therefore they felt that since those people didn't live according to the customs of the white Europeans they weren't protected from exploitation.In "New England" the English used a self serving philosophy to take the land from the native inhabitants. They decided that if the land was not enclosed (fences), and there were not inhabitations (villages and towns) and there were no tame cattle herds then the land was free for the taking. There were indeed settlements but not what the English viewed as proper towns. It was decreed the land belonged to King James I. He granted Royal Charters of vast tracts of land to English companies that came to exploit the land. Also, the native population was at an all time low because of deadly illnesses over the prior few decades in early America.At first the native inhabitants welcomed the newcomers. The English companies had received royal grants of the land and they brought token payments of trinkets and supplies for the native population. The natives had no concept of privately owned land so didn't understand that the English were taking possession of the land as their private property by "purchasing" it with those trinkets.Soon the troubles began when a few insightful native leaders realized what was happening. They were being starved and driven from their ancestral land. They became hunted and they retaliated. Slaughters from both sides ensued. However, not all natives waged war. Some continued to try to co-exist with the English. As English settlements multiplied and expanded inward those new English settlers wanted the natives removed altogether so they could settle ALL the land. The English decided the native population needed to be wiped out. The rest is history.Many Americans have forgotten how that history began and view the "native savages" as the instigators and perpetrators. They have convinced themselves that America was purchased fairly from the native inhabitants.
