Being unable to sieze the high ground on the first day put Lee at a disadvantage. Stuart's cavalry was out of place for much of the battle and unable to reconnoiter for Lee or give him much needed timely intelligence in order to make intelligent decisions as the tide of battle changed. For the first time, Lee was fighting without the assistance of his favorite subordinate commander, Stonewall Jackson, who had been killed by friendly fire at Chancellorsville. Lee's experience may have taught him the wrong lesson. His success against superior forces in the past made him believe that they could also defeat a well-defended position. Finally, he disrespected the forces he fought against. His victories against the Army of the Potomac did not take into consideration that they had finally beaten the learning curve, and had learned how to defeat him. They was fighting to defend their home soil, from a well-defended position were highly trained, experienced, and determined.
Had they won at Gettysburg, Lee could have marched unimpeded almost to Washington.
The battle was a Union (North) victory.
Slavery might be legal
Yes.
The Union.
Had they won at Gettysburg, Lee could have marched unimpeded almost to Washington.
Is this a serious question? The north won the Battle of Gettysburg... not the South...
The battle was a Union (North) victory.
Slavery might be legal
Yes.
The confederateThe Confederate Won The Battle Of Gettysburg
The Union won decisively.
Vicksburg
The Union won the battle of Devil's Den at Gettysburg
the uinon won.
The Union won the Battle of Gettysburg witch is know as the bloodies battle in the Civil War history.
The Battle of Gettysburg