The term ' creation scientist ' is somewhat of a misnomer in that the two words seem to contradict one another. However, there are scientists/researchers that will readily admit that their findings, both geological and archaelogical can be directly paralleled to the teachings of The Bible. For instance, we are taught that God created the first generations of all living things. The fossil record seems to confirm this. For a long time [ a geological moment] there was absolutely nothing on the earth. Then suddenly there was an abundance of life, plants, insects, animals and dinosaurs. We are also taught that a great worldwide flood destroyed the earth and that it was ' ..without form and void' of life. Again, the fossil records clearly indicates that such an event did actually occur. So certainly, there can be a sort of coexistence between science and creation.
The word 'secular' can be defined as 'not specifically religious'. Secular science is basic General Science without a religious influence. In much the same way that secular music is not necessarily religious music, secular science is not a religious discipline in that it does not involve, and is not bound by any monastic views or principles. Answer
A creation scientist would be a scientist that believes that something created the universe, while a secular scientist would probably not believe that, but would say that everything occurred by chance or natural processes.
Both scientists can still be "genuine" and relatively objective, but are looking at the problems from differing points of view. Both types of scientists, and indeed all people, have their own separate ways of looking at the world.
Science, n. Investigation of natural phenomena.
Engineering, n. Domestication of natural phenomena.
Technology, n. Domesticated natural phenomena.
Another Answer
"Creation scientists" have no concern about natural phenomena, just the supernatural phenomena described in the Bible. They aren't scientists.
Yes it was, religion didnt play a role in the creation of it, though philosophy did but that didnt occur until about the qin dynasty.
None. Both acts were inteded to insure a secular nation without control of the state by the Catholic Church.
It became more secular.
The word secular describes a position outside religion. Secular Jews are those, though Jews by birth, are not practitioners of Judaism.
madrigal
The non-secular belief that God created the world. The secular event that bounds a reality in existence from non-existence.
The creation of Frankenstein's monster was detrimental to the scientist's well-being.
he compared it to chess he compared it to chess
Runescape is the answer
Answer 2 A scientist. He's just believes something else. Uh... religious?
A creation is something that is made or brought into existence, typically by combining materials or ideas to produce something new. It can refer to a physical object, a piece of art, or an original concept.
I would say the only pretense for similarity of the secular view of creation and the non-secular view of creation is that they both require a beginning for Time in Space. Other than that, I would say that they represent completely separate and distinct ideologies.
You are being compared with the scientist-Einstein.
Drill cores from the ocean floor were dated and found to be very young compared to the age of the earth. This means the crust had to be formed recently, which can be explained by creation of crust at a spreading center.
Yes it was, religion didnt play a role in the creation of it, though philosophy did but that didnt occur until about the qin dynasty.
Yes it was, religion didnt play a role in the creation of it, though philosophy did but that didnt occur until about the qin dynasty.
This scientist is Robert Millikan (1868-1953).