This question is vague. Evidence does not have to be material in all situations. In a debate, for example, you use your words and knowledge to hold your position. In court, evidence is generally material because someones future is at stake, and tangible evidence is probably more reliable and easily reevaluated after long periods of standstill in a case.
This outlines close to ALL evidence: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ It's a lot of material, but if you read through even half of it you should be well-convinced.
Relevant evidence is evidence that has a tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Material evidence is evidence that is related to an issue in the case and has the potential to affect the outcome of the case. Relevant evidence is broader in scope, while material evidence specifically pertains to the issues at hand in a case.
Individual evidence is the material that can be related to a single source; individualization always involves a comparison
There is no confirmed evidence in favour of this.
Evidence shows that molten material erupts through this valley. The material then hardens to form the rock of the ocean floor.-Answered by Nadezda Dimsoski
Forensic Files - 2000 Material Evidence 5-8 was released on: USA: 31 October 2000
Evidence shows that molten material erupts through this valley. The material then hardens to form the rock of the ocean floor.-Answered by Nadezda Dimsoski
you should find more supporting evidence!
What standards of evidence should journalist
Pornographic material inside a suitcase
Pornographic material inside a suitcase
You mean TAINTED evidence. Tainted evidence is evidentiary material that has been collected in a manner or by a method which makes it inadmissible in court, and therefore, cannot be used in the prosecution of the offense.