0
Anonymous
Chat with our AI personalities
It is. (There is no question of should or should not.)It is. (There is no question of should or should not.)It is. (There is no question of should or should not.)It is. (There is no question of should or should not.)
Yeah, that is fine.
"He should have" is the correct grammar construction. "Should" is followed by the base form of the verb, which in this case is "have." "He should have arrived by now."
She should have had more stayed away from friends She should have had more time to spend She should have died when she was born She should have worn the crown of thorns She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have stood out in the crowd She should have made her mother proud She should have fallen on her stance She should have had another chance (x2) She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have stayed away from friends She should have had more time to spend She should have died when she was born She should have worn the crown of thorns She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have been a son She should have been a son
no they should not they should be an option to the pupil.
how should how should how should how should how should
The past tense of "should" is "should have." For example, "She should have finished her homework last night."
Should or agree
You should have gone
You should have gone.
Nope. It should be "He should have..."
The infinitive form of "should" is "to should."