Where infectious diseases are the issue, there is no difference between universal precautions and standard precautions. The suite of procedures called "universal precautions" should now be the standard precautions used in all cases of patient contact.
No, chickenpox precautions and universal precautions are different. Universal precautions is the principle of treating all patients as if they were known to have an infection. Chickenpox precautions are a specific approach to isolation that takes into account both respiratory isolation and contact isolation.
Airborne precautions
airborne, droplet, and contact
Yes, you could die from contact lenses by not puting them in right
Universal precautions is a term used in healthcare which indicates the level of precautions health care practitioners take while working with patients. These protect the patients, health care workers and visitors. This really is the most basic of things in developed countries with current practice. Specifically it includes washing hands before and after patient contact, wearing gloves, and sometimes using a mask when handling fluids. Basic clean practices.
In addition to Standard Precautions and Contact Precautions use Droplet (Respiratory) Precautions for patients known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms transmitted by droplets. Droplets can be generated by the patient coughing, sneezing, talking or during the performance of procedure (e.g. nebulisers).
Examples of disease requiring droplet precautions are meningococcal meningitis (a serious bacterial infection of the lining of the brain), influenza, mumps, and German measles (rubella).
Yes, symbolically the sprinkling or pouring will suffice. But, if the contact restrictions are lifted, the patient should be baptized by immersion.
There is no such thing as a Philanthropoligist. Perhaps you meant "philanthropist"?
None, if you meant "contract".
what kinds of precations are necssary in tuberculosis