It is Latin for, "first (or above all), do no harm".
"First do no harm". It is part of the Hippocratic Oath. This statement is not, repeat not, in any of the many versions of the Hippocratic Oath. Please see the Wikipedia entry for "primum non nocere" and "First do no harm". Moreover, it does not appear verbatim in any Hippocratic writings. Perhaps you all should do your homework. Cedric M. Smith, M.D.
Primum non nocere -- First, do no harm :}
Yes
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
The ethical principle closely associated with the maxim "primum non nocere" (first do no harm) is nonmaleficence. Nonmaleficence emphasizes the obligation of healthcare providers to avoid causing harm to patients, whether through action or inaction. This principle underlies many medical decisions and practices, ensuring that patient safety and well-being are prioritized in all aspects of care.
Primum non nocere (the correct spelling) is Latin for "First, do no harm."Although this is not literally part of the Hippocratric Oath, the Oath does contain a similar statement: "to abstain from doing harm."
Not first.
Nothing really. If you've done your best and tried to assist the patient, and used common sense, all should be well. Remember your Hippocrates: Primum non nocere -- First, do no harm.
Quo Primum was created in 1570.
Supplementum primum Prodromi florae Novae Hollandiae was created in 1830.
In the atrial defect primum, the blood shunt from the left to the right because of the blood volume overload from the right.