"First do no harm". It is part of the Hippocratic Oath. This statement is not, repeat not, in any of the many versions of the Hippocratic Oath. Please see the Wikipedia entry for "primum non nocere" and "First do no harm". Moreover, it does not appear verbatim in any Hippocratic writings. Perhaps you all should do your homework. Cedric M. Smith, M.D.
Primum non nocere -- First, do no harm :}
Yes
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
There is no such a principle as non- beneficence. There are two main ethical principles of beneficence (do good) and non- maleficence (do no harm or in Latin, Primum non nocere)
Primum non nocere (the correct spelling) is Latin for "First, do no harm."Although this is not literally part of the Hippocratric Oath, the Oath does contain a similar statement: "to abstain from doing harm."
Not first.
Nothing really. If you've done your best and tried to assist the patient, and used common sense, all should be well. Remember your Hippocrates: Primum non nocere -- First, do no harm.
Quo Primum was created in 1570.
Supplementum primum Prodromi florae Novae Hollandiae was created in 1830.
In the atrial defect primum, the blood shunt from the left to the right because of the blood volume overload from the right.
Well there isn't really a first law. I think you are talking about what LIONEL means.Location of incidentIncidentOther InfoNumber of injuredExtensive injuriesLocation of casualty (is there any dangers around the area?)The main thing which most get wrong is NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEY SCREAM, TREAT THE SILENT PEOPLE FIRST!!!There is also DR ABC which isDangerRespirationAssessBreathingCirculatory (C is usually cut out)I'd say the first law is Primum non Nocere: First, do no harm.